Cited by 1,216Income, Poverty, and InequalityFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsHistorical Economic and Social Studies

Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation

Sen, Amartya·1983

Abstract

The main focus of this book is on the causation of starvation in general and of famines in particular. The traditional analysis of famines concentrates on food supply. This is shown to be fundamentally defective—it is theoretically unsound, empirically inept, and dangerously misleading for policy. The author develops an alternative method of analysis—the ’entitlement approach’, which concentrates on ownership and exchange. Aside from developing the underlying theory, the approach is used in a number of case studies of recent famines, including the Great Bengal Famine of 1943, the Ethiopian famines of 1973 and 1974, the Bangladesh famine of 1974, and the famines in the countries of the African Sahel in the 1970s. The book also provides a general analysis of the characterization and measurement of poverty. Various approaches used in economics, sociology, and political theory are critically examined. The predominance of distributional issues, including distribution between different occupational groups, links up the problem of conceptualizing poverty with that of analysing starvation. The book contains some technical economic analysis, but the text of the book has been kept as informal as possible, so that the text is accessible to the non‐technical reader, and the main lines of reasoning and their applications to the case studies are easily followed. Technicalities and mathematical reasoning are confined to the four appendices, which (1) present a formal analysis of the notion of exchange entitlement, (2) provide illustrative models of exchange entitlement, (3) examine the problem of poverty measurement, and (4) analyse the pattern of famine mortality based on the Bengal famine of 1943.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/0198284632.001.0001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distributional policies, accountable decision makers, and a free press ensure that starvation in democracies does not evolve into famine.

    “Distributional policies, accountable decision makers, and a free press ensure that starvation in democracies does not evolve into famine (59,60).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [59]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sen, A.
Corresponding author
Sen, Amartya
Published
1983-01-20
OpenAlex
W2321036786
Cited by
1,216
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 59
FWCI
49.96
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
Keywords
famine, starvation, poverty, entitlement approach, food exchange, poverty measurement, famine mortality, distributional inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review