Cited by 32Obesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEarly Childhood Education and Development

The Child-care Food and Activity Practices Questionnaire (CFAPQ): Development and first validation steps

Open access
Gubbels, Jessica S, Sleddens, Ester FC, Raaijmakers, Lieke CH, Gies, Judith M, Kremers, Stef PJ·2016·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a questionnaire to measure food-related and activity-related practices of child-care staff, based on existing, validated parenting practices questionnaires. DESIGN: A selection of items from the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) and the Preschooler Physical Activity Parenting Practices (PPAPP) questionnaire was made to include items most suitable for the child-care setting. The converted questionnaire was pre-tested among child-care staff during cognitive interviews and pilot-tested among a larger sample of child-care staff. Factor analyses with Varimax rotation and internal consistencies were used to examine the scales. Spearman correlations, t tests and ANOVA were used to examine associations between the scales and staff's background characteristics (e.g. years of experience, gender). SETTING: Child-care centres in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: The qualitative pre-test included ten child-care staff members. The quantitative pilot test included 178 child-care staff members. RESULTS: The new questionnaire, the Child-care Food and Activity Practices Questionnaire (CFAPQ), consists of sixty-three items (forty food-related and twenty-three activity-related items), divided over twelve scales (seven food-related and five activity-related scales). The CFAPQ scales are to a large extent similar to the original CFPQ and PPAPP scales. The CFAPQ scales show sufficient internal consistency with Cronbach's α ranging between 0·53 and 0·96, and average corrected item-total correlations within acceptable ranges (0·30-0·89). Several of the scales were significantly associated with child-care staff's background characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Scale psychometrics of the CFAPQ indicate it is a valid questionnaire that assesses child-care staff's practices related to both food and activities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980015003444

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The practices questionnaire is based on previous work by Gevers et al. and O'Connor et al., and the existing questionnaires were used in several previous Dutch studies.

    “A questionnaire, based on previous work by Gevers et al. [39] and O’Connor et al. [40], is used to examine HP practices of teachers at school and parents at home, e.g., rules, modelling behaviour, encouragement, and availability. The existing questionnaires were used in several previous Dutch studies [41,42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]Bernstein IH & Nunnally J (1994) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gubbels, J. S., Sleddens, E. F., Raaijmakers, L. C., Gies, J. M., & Kremers, S. P.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Gubbels, Jessica S
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2015-12-04
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1964-1975
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2181408712
Cited by
32
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.145.091)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
child care staff, feeding practices, physical activity practice, questionnaire development, psychometric validation, daycare centers, parenting practices, preschool children
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adolescent, Adult, Child Day Care Centers, Child, Preschool, Diet, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Parenting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review