Cited by 69Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometrics of the preschooler physical activity parenting practices instrument among a Latino sample

Open access
O’Connor, Teresia M, Cerin, Ester, Hughes, Sheryl O, Robles, Jessica, Thompson, Deborah I, Mendoza, Jason A, Baranowski, Tom, Lee, Rebecca E·2014·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Latino preschoolers (3-5 year old children) have among the highest rates of obesity. Low levels of physical activity (PA) are a risk factor for obesity. Characterizing what Latino parents do to encourage or discourage their preschooler to be physically active can help inform interventions to increase their PA. The objective was therefore to develop and assess the psychometrics of a new instrument: the Preschooler Physical Activity Parenting Practices (PPAPP) among a Latino sample, to assess parenting practices used to encourage or discourage PA among preschool-aged children. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 240 Latino parents who reported the frequency of using PA parenting practices. 95% of respondents were mothers; 42% had more than a high school education. Child mean age was 4.5 (±0.9) years (52% male). Test-retest reliability was assessed in 20%, 2 weeks later. We assessed the fit of a priori models using Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). In a separate sub-sample (35%), preschool-aged children wore accelerometers to assess associations with their PA and PPAPP subscales. RESULTS: The a-priori models showed poor fit to the data. A modified factor structure for encouraging PPAPP had one multiple-item scale: engagement (15 items), and two single-items (have outdoor toys; not enroll in sport-reverse coded). The final factor structure for discouraging PPAPP had 4 subscales: promote inactive transport (3 items), promote screen time (3 items), psychological control (4 items) and restricting for safety (4 items). Test-retest reliability (ICC) for the two scales ranged from 0.56-0.85. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.5-0.9. Several sub-factors correlated in the expected direction with children's objectively measured PA. CONCLUSION: The final models for encouraging and discouraging PPAPP had moderate to good fit, with moderate to excellent test-retest reliabilities. The PPAPP should be further evaluated to better assess its associations with children's PA and offers a new tool for measuring PPAPP among Latino families with preschool-aged children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1479-5868-11-3

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The practices questionnaire is based on previous work by Gevers et al. and O'Connor et al., and the existing questionnaires were used in several previous Dutch studies.

    “A questionnaire, based on previous work by Gevers et al. [39] and O’Connor et al. [40], is used to examine HP practices of teachers at school and parents at home, e.g., rules, modelling behaviour, encouragement, and availability. The existing questionnaires were used in several previous Dutch studies [41,42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Connor, T. M., Cerin, E., Hughes, S. O., Robles, J., Thompson, D. I., Mendoza, J. A., Baranowski, T., & Lee, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
O’Connor, Teresia M
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2014
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110994939
Cited by
69
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Agricultural Research Service
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA131178)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD060925)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
parenting practices, Latino children, instrument development, psychometric validation, childhood obesity, screen time, psychological control, test-retest reliability, factor structure, accelerometer-measured activity
MeSH terms
Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Obesity, Parent-Child Relations, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review