Cited by 104Urban Agriculture and SustainabilityFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The impact of urban gardens on adequate and healthy food: a systematic review

Open access
Garcia, Mariana T, Ribeiro, Silvana M, Germani, Ana Claudia Camargo Gonçalves, Bógus, Cláudia M·2018·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impacts on food and nutrition-related outcomes resulting from participation in urban gardens, especially on healthy food practices, healthy food access, and healthy food beliefs, knowledge and attitudes. Design: The systematic review identified studies by searching the PubMed, ERIC, LILACS, Web of Science and Embase databases. An assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies was carried out and a narrative summary was produced. Setting: Studies published as original articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals in English, Spanish or Portuguese between 2005 and 2015 were included. Subjects: The studies included were based on data from adult participants in urban gardens. Results: Twenty-four studies were initially selected based on the eligibility criteria, twelve of which were included. There was important heterogeneity of settings, population and assessment methods. Assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies revealed the need for greater methodological rigour. Most studies investigated community gardens and employed a qualitative approach. The following were reported: greater fruit and vegetable consumption, better access to healthy foods, greater valuing of cooking, harvest sharing with family and friends, enhanced importance of organic production, and valuing of adequate and healthy food. Conclusions: Thematic patterns related to adequate and healthy food associated with participation in urban gardens were identified, revealing a positive impact on practices of adequate and healthy food and mainly on food perceptions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980017002944

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Garcia, M. T., Ribeiro, S. M., Germani, A. C. C. G., & Bógus, C. M.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Garcia, Mariana T
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
416-425
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2770474037
Cited by
104
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
urban gardens, community gardens, healthy food access, fruit and vegetable intake, food knowledge, organic food, cooking practices, food sharing, nutritional outcomes
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Gardens, Fruit, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Urban Population, Vegetables, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Databases, Factual, Gardening, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review