Cited by 53Cancer survivorship and careUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityDiverse Educational Innovations Studies

Harvest for health gardening intervention feasibility study in cancer survivors

Open access
Blair, Cindy K., Madan-Swain, Avi, Locher, Julie L., Desmond, Renee A., de Los Santos, Jennifer, Affuso, Olivia, Glover, Tony, Smith, Kerry +6 more·2013·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors are at increased risk for second malignancies, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and functional decline. Evidence suggests that a healthful diet and physical activity may reduce the risk of chronic disease and improve health in this population. METHODS: We conducted a feasibility study to evaluate a vegetable gardening intervention that paired 12 adult and child cancer survivors with Master Gardeners to explore effects on fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity, quality-of-life, and physical function. Throughout the year-long study period, the survivor-Master Gardener dyads worked together to plan/plant three gardens, harvest/rotate plantings, and troubleshoot/correct problems. Data on diet, physical activity, and quality-of-life were collected via surveys; anthropometrics and physical function were objectively measured. Acceptability of the intervention was assessed with a structured debriefing survey. RESULTS: The gardening intervention was feasible (robust enrollment; minimal attrition) and well-received by cancer survivors and Master Gardeners. Improvement in three of four objective measures of strength, agility, and endurance was observed in 90% of survivors, with the following change scores [median (interquartile range)] noted between baseline and one-year follow-up: hand grip test [+ 4.8 (3.0, 6.7) kg], 2.44 meter Get-Up-and-Go [+ 1.0 (+ 1.8, + 0.2) seconds], 30-second chair stand [+ 3.0 (+ 1.0, 5.0) stands], and six-minute walk [+ 11.6 (6.1, 48.8) meters]. Increases of ≥ 1 fruit and vegetable serving/day and ≥ 30 minutes/week of physical activity were observed in 40% and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results support the feasibility and acceptability of a mentored gardening intervention and suggest that it may offer a novel and promising strategy to improve fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, and physical function in cancer survivors. A larger randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm our results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0284186x.2013.770165

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, C. K., Madan-Swain, A., Locher, J. L., Desmond, R. A., de Los Santos, J., Affuso, O., Glover, T., Smith, K., Carley, J., Lipsitz, M., Sharma, A., Krontiras, H., Cantor, A., & Demark-Wahnefried, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Auburn University System (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital (US)
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2013-02-26
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
1110-1118
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2006828557
Cited by
53
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Oncologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr025777-04, UL1TR000165)
  • National Institute on Aging (K07AG043588)
  • National Cancer Institute (5R25CA76023, R25CA076023, R01CA201362, R25CA047888, P30CA014236)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5UL 1RR025777, UL1-RR-025777)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Keywords
cancer survivors, vegetable gardening, Master Gardeners, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity, physical function, quality of life, intervention feasibility, treatment acceptability, grip strength, cardiorespiratory fitness
MeSH terms
Diet, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Neoplasms, Exercise, Survivors, Gardening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review