Cited by 142Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR): a once-daily monotherapy effective in generalized anxiety disorder. Data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study

Open access
Bandelow, Borwin, Chouinard, Guy, Bobes, Julio, Ahokas, Antti, Eggens, Ivan, Liu, Sherry, Eriksson, Hans·2010·The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) once-daily monotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was assessed. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, phase III trial consisted of a 1- to 4-wk enrolment/wash-out period and a 10-wk (8-wk active treatment, 2-wk post-treatment drug-discontinuation) study period; 873 patients were randomized to 50 mg or 150 mg quetiapine XR, 20 mg paroxetine, or placebo. Primary endpoint was change from randomization at week 8 in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) total score. At week 8, all active agents produced significant improvements in HAMA total and psychic subscale scores vs. placebo; HAMA somatic subscale scores were significantly reduced only by 150 mg quetiapine XR. Significant separation from placebo (-2.90) in HAMA total score was observed at day 4 for 50 mg quetiapine XR (-4.43, p<0.001) and 150 mg quetiapine XR (-3.86, p<0.05), but not for paroxetine (-2.69). Remission (HAMA total score 7) rates at week 8 were significantly higher for 150 mg quetiapine XR (42.6%, p<0.01) and paroxetine (38.8%, p<0.05) vs. placebo (27.2%). The most common adverse events (AEs) were dry mouth, somnolence, fatigue, dizziness, and headache, for quetiapine XR, and nausea, headache, dizziness for paroxetine. A lower proportion of patients reported sexual dysfunction with quetiapine XR [0.9% (50 mg), 1.8% (150 mg)] than with placebo (2.3%) or paroxetine (7.4%). The incidence of AEs potentially related to extrapyramidal symptoms was: quetiapine XR: 50 mg, 6.8%, 150 mg, 5.0%; placebo, 1.8%; and paroxetine, 8.4%. Once-daily quetiapine XR is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for patients with GAD, with symptom improvement seen as early as day 4.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145709990423

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FDA reported that safety concerns for esketamine are misuse, abuse, dissociation, and sedation, for which a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy was planned.

    “Additionally, the FDA reported that the safety concerns for esketamine are misuse, abuse, dissociation, and sedation, for which a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy was planned [143, 144].”

    From Acute and Persistent Withdrawal Syndromes Following Discontinuation of Psychotropic Medications (2020) · cites this paper as [144]

    The Safety and tolerability assessments and Discussion passages concern quetiapine XR in generalized anxiety disorder, not esketamine. Searches for esketamine, FDA safety concerns, and a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy found no passage addressing the attributed statement. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandelow, B., Chouinard, G., Bobes, J., Ahokas, A., Eggens, I., Liu, S., & Eriksson, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bandelow, Borwin
Venue
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2009-08-20
Volume
13
Issue
03
Pages
305
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2139280604
Cited by
142
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, atypical antipsychotics, sustained-release formulation, monotherapy, paroxetine, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, remission, sexual dysfunction, extrapyramidal symptoms, adverse events, drug tolerability, dose comparison, antidepressant efficacy, somatic anxiety, washout period
MeSH terms
Quetiapine Fumarate, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Dibenzothiazepines, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Antipsychotic Agents, Drug Delivery Systems, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review