Cited by 181Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Interruption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Michelson, David, Fava, Maurizio, Amsterdam, Jay, Apter, Jeffrey, Londborg, Peter, Tamura, Roy, Tepner, Rosalinda G.·2000·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Abrupt interruption of therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has been associated with somatic and psychological symptoms. Aims: Systematically to assess symptoms and effects on daily functioning related to interruption of SSRI therapy. Method: Patients treated with fluoxetine, setraline or paroxetine underwent identical five-day periods of treatment interruption and continued active treatment under double-blind, order-randomised conditions, with regular assessment of new symptoms. Results: Placebo substitution for paroxetine was associated with increases in the number and severity of adverse events following the second missed dose, and increases in functional impairment at five days. Placebo substitution for sertraline resulted in less pronounced changes, while interruption of fluoxetine was not associated with any significant increase in symptomatology. Conclusions: Abrupt interruption of SSRI treatment can result in a syndrome characterised by specific physical and psychological symptoms. Incidence, timing and severity of symptoms vary among SSRIs in a fashion that appears to be related to plasma elimination characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.176.4.363

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Withdrawal symptoms are more common when SSRIs are given in higher doses or for longer periods.

    “Withdrawal symptoms are more common when SSRIs are given in higher doses 55,56 , or for longer periods 55 .”

    From Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Symptom measures section reports no significant relationship between either dose or time on treatment and new symptoms. The Clinical relevance section also says the authors did not find increased risk with longer exposure; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A hyperbolic relationship has been demonstrated between dose of SSRI and risk of withdrawal symptoms.

    “Furthermore, a hyperbolic relationship exists between dose of SSRI and reduction of depressed mood, as demonstrated in a mega-analysis 67 ; a hyperbolic relationship has also been demonstrated between dose of SSRI and risk of withdrawal symptoms 55 .”

    From Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Symptom measures section reports no significant relationship between SSRI dose and new symptoms after treatment interruption. The Relationships to plasma drug concentrations section likewise says doses did not correlate with interruption symptoms in any drug group. It reports an association with the percentage reduction in plasma concentration across drug groups, not a hyperbolic dose–risk relationship. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A hyperbolic relationship exists between dose of SSRI and reduction of depressed mood.

    “Furthermore, a hyperbolic relationship exists between dose of SSRI and reduction of depressed mood, as demonstrated in a mega-analysis 67 ; a hyperbolic relationship has also been demonstrated between dose of SSRI and risk of withdrawal symptoms 55 .”

    From Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as [55]

    This paper is cited for the second clause of the sentence, concerning SSRI dose and withdrawal symptoms, not the depressed-mood claim attributed to citation 67. In 'Symptom measures' (page unavailable), it reports no significant relationship between dose and new symptoms after treatment interruption; 'Relationships to plasma drug concentrations' likewise reports no dose–symptom correlation. It does not demonstrate the claimed hyperbolic relationship. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Acute withdrawal syndromes have been reported over decades in various case reports and were later confirmed in placebo-controlled treatment-interruption trials and systematic reviews.

    “Acute withdrawal syndromes have been reported over decades in various case reports (e.g. Bloch et al., 1995; Kostic et al., 2024; Kramer et al., 1961) and were later confirmed in placebo-controlled treatment-interruption trials (e.g. Michelson et al., 2000; Rosenbaum et al., 1998), and systematic reviews (e.g. Davies and Read, 2019; Fava et al., 2015, 2018).”
  • The prevalence of discontinuation symptoms differs according to the pharmacological profile of SSRI.

    “and to differ in prevalence according to the pharmacological profile of SSRI [20,21]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]11. ROY TAMURA, PhD, ROSALINDA G. TEPNER, RPh, Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis ROY TAMURA, PhD, ROSALINDA G. TEPNER, RPh, Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis Correspondence: Dr David Michelson, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Drop Code Correspondence: Dr David Michelson, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Drop Code 2423, Indianapolis, IN 46285,USA.Tel: (317) 277-6443; Fax: (317) 277-3262; e-mail: 2423, Indianapolis, IN 46285,USA.Tel: (317) 277-64 43; Fax: (317) 277-3262; e-mail: dmichelson dmichelson@ @lilly.com lilly.com (First received 26 February 1999, final revision 25 June 1999, accepted 17 August 1999) (First received 26 February 1999, final revision 25 June 1999, accepted 17 August 1999) https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.4.363 Published online by Cambridge University Press 1. 1. Dizziness Dizziness 2. 2. Nausea Nausea 3. 3. Unusual dreams Unusual dreams 4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michelson, D., Fava, M., Amsterdam, J., Apter, J., Londborg, P., Tamura, R., & Tepner, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Michelson, David
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-04
Volume
176
Issue
4
Pages
363-368
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2178264880
Cited by
181
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, treatment interruption, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, adverse events, functional disability, plasma elimination, antidepressant discontinuation
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review