Cited by 88Treatment of Major DepressionEpigenetics and DNA MethylationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The epigenetic effects of antidepressant treatment on human prefrontal cortex BDNF expression

Open access
Chen, Elizabeth S., Ernst, Carl, Turecki, Gustavo·2011·The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Convergent lines of evidence suggest that major depression is associated with neurotrophin alterations, particularly decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels (Martinowich et al.2007). The gene that codes for BDNF has distinct splice variants, each one regulated by a specific promoter region (Tsankova et al.2004). Of these variants, BDNF transcript IV is the most commonly studied and its expression changes have been associated with behavioural responses following antidepressant treatment in animal models of depression (Bredy et al.2007; Tsankova et al.2006). In a recent study investigating mice exposed to chronic social defeat stress, a model of depression, Tsankova and colleagues (2006) reported that a 4-fold increase in histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) methylation was associated with repression of BDNF IV expression. Treatment of the chronically defeated mice with imipramine increased expression of BDNF IV to baseline levels, but could not reverse the alteration of H3K27 methylation. To assess the relationship between major depression, antidepressant medication, BDNF IV expression, and H3K27 methylation at the BDNF IV promoter in humans, we quantified BDNF IV expression and H3K27 tri-methylation levels in prefrontal cortex of control subjects with no psychiatric history (n=9, Con), major depressive disorder (MDD) subjects without positive toxicology for antidepressants or history of antidepressant use (n=11, AD−), and MDD subjects with a history of antidepressant use and with antidepressant detected in post-mortem toxicology (n=7, AD+). Antidepressants used included: fluoxetine (1/7), venlafaxine (2/7), clomipramine (1/7), amytriptyline (1/7), citalopram (1/7) and doxepine (1/7). Toxicological screens were performed using mass spectrometry with known standards for all commercially available antidepressants and psychotropic compounds, as well as illicit drugs. To reduce sample heterogeneity, no subjects with psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder or with positive toxicology for alcohol or illicit drugs were used in this study, and all subjects were male Caucasians of French Canadian origin. All MDD subjects died by suicide and diagnoses for MDD cases and controls were made using proxy-based SCID-1 interviews complemented by hospital records, as described previously (Dumais et al.2005). Analysis of covariance revealed no significant associations between post-mortem index, brain pH, age, and BDNF expression or H3K27 methylation. All research was approved by the Internal Review Board of McGill University and informed consent was received from next-of-kin. After extracting RNA from BA 10 from all subjects and testing RNA quality (Agilent Technologies, USA; RNA integrity number >7), we performed RT–PCR on a 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA) using primers directed at BDNF IV – a homologous region to that used by Tsankova et al. (2006) (5′-GCTGCAGAACAGAAGGAGTACA-3′; antisense: 5′-GTCCTCATCCAACAGCTCTTCTATC-3′) and two control genes, GAPDH and β-actin. The AD+ group showed higher levels of BNDF IV expression than AD− (F=4.395, p=0.024; post-hoc Tukey test significance values: C vs. AD− 0.72; C vs. AD+ 0.109; AD− vs. AD+ 0.020; Fig. 1a). (a) qRT–PCR relative quotient values of BDNF and two housekeeping genes (ACTB and GAPDH) and (b) H3K27 tri-methylation levels at BDNF IV promoter in prefrontal cortex of controls (free of psychopathology and free of antidepressants), AD− (subjects with major depression, no history of antidepressant use, and free of antidepressants), and AD+ (subjects with major depression that used antidepressants and who had a history of antidepressant use). Variance bars represent standard error of the mean. ChIP assays were performed as detailed previously (Huang et al.2006). Briefly, we extracted DNA from BA 10 from all subjects and immunoprecipated DNA with an antibody directed at H3K27 tri-methyl residue (Upstate Biotechnology, USA). First, positive (GRIN2A) and negative (haemoglobin gene, HBB) controls were used in all cases and specificity was assessed by using non-immune immunoglobulin and a no-antibody pull-down. Next, input and bound DNA fractions were amplified using primers targeted to the human homolog of the BDNF region used by Tsankova et al. (2006) (5′-GTGAGAACCCTGGGGCAAAGG-3′; antisense: 5′-ACGGAAAAGAGGGAGGTGAAG-3′). Input and bound DNA were run on the same plates for all subjects and data were generated by comparing the Ct value differences between input and bound DNA fractions. We found a significant difference in H3K27 tri-methylation levels among groups (F=9.379, p=0.001; Fig. 1b). Post-hoc Tukey analysis revealed that the AD+ group presented significantly lower H3K27 methylation levels than AD− and control groups (C vs. AD− 0.914; C vs. AD+ 0.004; AD− vs. AD+ 0.001). To ensure the specificity of these findings we performed qRT–PCR in identical cDNA as that used for BDNF IV. We assessed expression changes using primers directed at BDNF I (5′-CACCCAGC

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145710001422

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aberrant H3K4me3 or H3K27me3 has been described in the promoter regions of OAZ1, TRKB, and BDNF in antidepressant-treated patients in postmortem prefrontal cortex.

    “Aberrant H3K4me3 or H3K27me3—a repressive histone mark—has also been described in the promoter regions of OAZ1 , TRKB , and BDNF in patients treated with antidepressants, in postmortem PFC.”

    From Epigenetics and depression (2019) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, E. S., Ernst, C., & Turecki, G.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Turecki, Gustavo
Venue
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2010-12-07
Volume
14
Issue
03
Pages
427-429
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2171330792
Cited by
88
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CGS D3)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
major depressive disorder, antidepressant treatment, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, H3K27 methylation, epigenetics, prefrontal cortex, suicide, postmortem toxicology, fluoxetine, chronic social defeat stress, imipramine, neurotrophins, depression biomarkers
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Humans, Prefrontal Cortex, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review