Cited by 177Treatment of Major DepressionTryptophan and brain disordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

A randomized add-on trial of high-dose d-cycloserine for treatment-resistant depression

Open access
Heresco-Levy, Uriel, Gelfin, Genia, Bloch, Boaz, Levin, Raz, Edelman, Shani, Javitt, Daniel C, Kremer, Ilana·2013·International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Antagonism of N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamatergic receptors (NMDAR) may represent an effective antidepressant mechanism. d-cycloserine (DCS) is a partial agonist at the NMDAR-associated glycine modulatory site that at high doses acts as a functional NMDAR antagonist. Twenty-six treatment-resistant major depressive disorder patients participated in a double blind, placebo-controlled, 6-wk parallel group trial with a gradually titrated high dose (1000 mg/d) of DCS added to their antidepressant medication. DCS treatment was well tolerated, had no psychotomimetic effects and led to improvement in depression symptoms as measured by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD; p = 0.005) and Beck Depression Inventory (p = 0.046). Of the 13 subjects treated with DCS, 54% had a ⩾50% HAMD score reduction vs. 15% of the 13 patients randomized to placebo (p = 0.039). A significant (p = 0.043) treatment× pre-treatment glycine serum levels interaction was registered. These findings indicate that NMDAR glycine site antagonism may be a cost-effective target for development of mechanistically novel antidepressants. Larger-sized DCS trials are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145712000910

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a larger (n = 26) RCT, high-dose DCS augmentation showed superior AD efficacy to placebo.

    “The same group of researchers later conducted a larger (n = 26) RCT, in which high-dose DCS augmentation showed superior AD efficacy to placebo [171].”
  • Partial agonists at the NMDAR glycineB binding site, including GLYX-13 and D-cycloserine, manifest antidepressant effects in clinical trials and animal tests without sharing ketamine's NMDAR inhibition-mediated side effects.

    “Another finding challenging the NMDAR inhibition hypothesis of ketamine’s antidepressant mechanism of action is the fact that partial agonists at the NMDAR glycineB binding site, including GLYX-13 (i.e., rapastinel) and D-cycloserine manifest antidepressant effects in clinical trials 104, 105 and in animal tests 106–109, without sharing ketamine’s NMDAR inhibition-mediated side effects 109.”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant (2018) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Boyer PA, Skolnick P, Fossom LH (1998). Chronic administration of imipramine and citalopram alters the expression of NMDA receptor subunit mRNAs in mouse brain : a quantitative in situ hybridization study. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 10, 219-233.
  2. Crane GE (1959). Cycloserine as an anti-depressant agent. American Journal of Psychiatry 115, 1025-1029.
  3. Entsuah AR, Huang H, Thase ME (2001). Response and remission rates in different sub-populations with major depressive disorder administered venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or placebo. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 62, 869-877.
  4. Hamilton M (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology 175, 17-22.
  5. Hamilton M (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 23, 56-62.
  6. Neeman G, Blanaru M, Bloch B, Kremer I, et al. (2005). Relation of plasma glycine, serine and homocysteine levels to schizophrenia symptoms and medication type. American Journal of Psychiatry 162, 1738-1740.
  7. Preskorn SH, Baker B, Kolluri S, Menniti FS, et al. (2008). An innovative design to establish proof of concept of the antidepressant effects of the NR2B subunit selection N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, CP-101,606, in patients with treatment-refractory major depressive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 28, 631-637.
  8. Shleper M, Kartvelishvily E, Wolosker H (2005). D-serine is the dominant endogenous coagonist for NMDA receptor neurotoxicity in organotypic hippocampal slices. Journal of Neuroscience 25, 9413-9417.
  9. Sumiyoshi T, Anil AE, Jin D, Jayathilake K, et al. (2004). Plasma glycine and serine levels in schizophrenia compared to normal controls and major depression : relation to negative symptoms. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 7, 1-8.
  10. Thase ME, Haight BR, Richard N, Rockett CB, et al. (2005). Remission rates following antidepressant therapy with bupropion or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors : a meta-analysis of original data from 7 randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 66, 974-981.
  11. Tuominen HJ, Tuominen J, Wahlbeck K (2006). Glutamatergic drugs for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database System Review 2, CD003730.
  12. Zarate CA, Manji HK (2008). The promising role of the glutamate system in mood disorders. In : Heresco-Levy U, Javitt DC (Eds.), Glutamate in Neuropsychiatric Disorders (pp. 213-251). Kerala, India : Research Signpost.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heresco-Levy, U., Gelfin, G., Bloch, B., Levin, R., Edelman, S., Javitt, D. C., & Kremer, I.
Affiliations
  • Psychiatry Department, Ezrath-Nashim Herzog Memorial Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Herzog Hospital (IL)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
501-506
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2146645762
Cited by
177
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
D-cycloserine, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, NMDA receptor antagonism, antidepressant mechanism, newer antidepressants
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Cycloserine, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Resistance, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review