Cited by 194Planetary Science and ExplorationSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeSpace exploration and regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 280 of the 280 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustainable life support on Mars – the potential roles of cyanobacteria

Open access
Verseux, Cyprien, Baqué, Mickael, Lehto, Kirsi, de Vera, Jean-Pierre P., Rothschild, Lynn J., Billi, Daniela·2016·International Journal of Astrobiology

Abstract

Even though technological advances could allow humans to reach Mars in the coming decades, launch costs prohibit the establishment of permanent manned outposts for which most consumables would be sent from Earth. This issue can be addressed by in situ resource utilization: producing part or all of these consumables on Mars, from local resources. Biological components are needed, among other reasons because various resources could be efficiently produced only by the use of biological systems. But most plants and microorganisms are unable to exploit Martian resources, and sending substrates from Earth to support their metabolism would strongly limit the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of their cultivation. However, resources needed to grow specific cyanobacteria are available on Mars due to their photosynthetic abilities, nitrogen-fixing activities and lithotrophic lifestyles. They could be used directly for various applications, including the production of food, fuel and oxygen, but also indirectly: products from their culture could support the growth of other organisms, opening the way to a wide range of life-support biological processes based on Martian resources. Here we give insights into how and why cyanobacteria could play a role in the development of self-sustainable manned outposts on Mars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s147355041500021x

Cites

280 of 280 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 280 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Zhukov-Verezhnikov, 1962, Results of first microbiological and cytological experiments on Earth satellites in space, Artif. Earth Satell., 11, 47
  2. Williams, 1995, Design of a water vapor adsorption reactor for Martian in situ resource utilization, J. Br. Interplanet. Soc., 48, 347
  3. Allen, 1997, Lunar and Planetary Science XXVII, LPI Contribution No. 1593
  4. Henrikson, 2009, Earth Food Spirulina
  5. Dalton, 2008, Lunar Regolith Biomining: Workshop Report (NASA/CP-2008-214564)
  6. Perchonok, 2012, Mission to Mars: Food Production and Processing for the Final Frontier, NASA Spec. ed, Annual Review of Food Science and Technology.
  7. Drake, 2009, Human Exploration of Mars: Design Reference Architecture 5.0 (NASA-SP-2009-566).
  8. Clapp, 1985, The Case for Mars II, 557
  9. Billi, 2010, Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, 1517
  10. Allen, 2003, Guidelines and Capabilities for Designing Human Missions (NASA/TM–2003–210785)
  11. Lehto, 2007, ROME: Response of Organisms to the Martian Environment (ESA AP-1299), 151
  12. 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2009.35.215 · DOI
  13. Nelson, 2010, Handbook of Environmental Engineering, Volume 10: Environmental Biotechnology, 517
  14. Hoffman, 1997, Human Exploration of Mars: the Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team (NASA Special Publication 6107).
  15. Langhoff, 2011, What are the Potential Roles for Synthetic Biology in NASA's Mission? (NASA/CP-2011-216430).
  16. Meyer, 1984, The Case for Mars, 209
  17. Wheeler, 2004, ISHS Acta Horticulturae 642, 201

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Verseux, C., Baqué, M., Lehto, K., de Vera, J.-P. P., Rothschild, L. J., & Billi, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Verseux, Cyprien
Venue
International Journal of Astrobiology
Published
2015-08-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
65-92
ISSN
  • 1473-5504 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3006
OpenAlex
W1957322865
Cited by
194
References
280
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2015: 6
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Yale University
  • Universities Space Research Association
  • Aalto-Yliopisto
  • Ames Research Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
Keywords
cyanobacteria, in-situ resource utilization, nitrogen fixation, photosynthesis, oxygen production, biofuel production, food production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review