Cited by 89Nursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCancer survivorship and care

The influence of psychological factors on the burden of caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: Resiliency and caregiver burden

Palacio, Carolina, Krikorian, Alicia, Limonero, Joaquín T.·2018·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective:The aim of our study was to identify the influence of such psychological factors as emotional intelligence and perceived competence on caregiver burden in those who care for patients with advanced cancer. Method A total of 50 informal caregivers completed self-report assessments of resilience, perceived competence, emotional regulation, positive aspects of care, emotional distress, and burden. We conducted a quantitative study with a cross-sectional design. Descriptive statistics were obtained. Associations between the different variables were assessed using nonparametric and multiple regression analyses. Results Participants were mainly female (88%) and had an average of 20 months of caregiving. Their mean age was 47 years (range = 20-79). More than half of scored high on resilience, positive aspects of caring, and emotional distress, moderately on perceived competence, and low on burden. Most caregivers used cognitive restructuring and social support as coping strategies. Inverse negative correlations were observed among emotional distress, emotional state, and burden with perceived competence and positive aspects of caring (p Significance of results Resilience, perceived competence, emotional regulation, and positive aspects of care constitute protective factors against caregiver burden. Taken together, these aspects should be promoted by the healthcare staff in order to facilitate caregiver adaptation and well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951517000268

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palacio, C., Krikorian, A., & Limonero, J. T.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Palacio, Carolina
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2017-05-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
269-277
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W2610343097
Cited by
89
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
caregiver burden, advanced cancer, informal caregivers, resilience, perceived competence, emotional distress, emotion regulation, coping strategies, cognitive restructuring, social support, protective factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Perception, Psychology, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Statistics, Nonparametric, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review