CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 394Disability Rights and RepresentationNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity

Ortega, Francisco·2009·BioSocieties
DOI 10.1017/s1745855209990287
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1745855209990287

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Antonetta S. (2005). A mind apart: Travels in a neurodiverse world. London: Penguin.
  2. Corker M. (1999). New disability discourse, the principle of optimization and social change. In Corker M., & French S. (Eds), Disability discourse, 192–209. Buckingham: Open UP.
  3. Corker M., & French S. (Eds) (1999). Disability discourse. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open UP.
  4. Ehrenberg A. (2004). Le Sujet cerebral. Esprit, 309, 130–155.
  5. Hacking I. (2002). Making up people. Historical Ontology, 99–114. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
  6. Hacking I. (2006). What is Tom saying to Maureen? London Review of Books, 28(9). URL (accessed May 2007): www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n09/hack01_.html
  7. Martin E. (2009). Identity, identification, and the brain. Presented at the workshop ‘Neurocultures’, Max Planck Institute of the History of Science, Berlin, 20–22 February.
  8. Merzenich M.M., & Jenkins W.M. (1994), Cortical representations of learned behaviors. In Andersen P., Hvalby O., Paulsen O., & Hokfelt B. (Eds), Memory concepts, 437–454. New York: Elsevier.
  9. Nadesan M.H. (2005) Constructing autism: Unravelling the ‘truth’ and understanding the social. London and New York: Routledge.
  10. Singer J. (1999). Why can't you be normal for once in your life? From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In Corker M., & French S. (Eds), Disability discourse, 59–67. Buckingham: Open UP.
  11. Swain J., & Cameron C. (1999). Unless otherwise stated: Discourses of labeling and identity in coming out. In Corker M., & French S. (Eds), Disability discourse, 68–78. Buckingham: Open UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ortega, F.
Affiliations
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Ortega, Francisco
ORCID
Ortega, Francisco
Venue
BioSocieties
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
425-445
ISSN
  • 1745-8552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-8560
DOI
10.1017/s1745855209990287
OpenAlex
W2158271805
Cited by
394
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
27.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
BioSocieties (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
neurodiversity movement, autism spectrum disorder, autistic self-advocacy, autistic identity, autistic culture, biomedicalization, identity construction, social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review