Cited by 98Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionGut microbiota and health

Diversity of gut methanogens in herbivorous animals.

Open access
St-Pierre, B., Wright, A.-D.G.·2013·Animal

Abstract

The digestion of plant biomass by symbiotic microbial communities in the gut of herbivore hosts also results in the production of methane, a greenhouse gas that is released into the environment where it contributes to climate change. As methane is exclusively produced by methanogenic archaea, various research groups have devoted their efforts to investigate the population structure of symbiotic methanogens in the gut of herbivores. In this review, we summarized and compared currently available results from 16S rRNA gene clone library studies, which cover a broad range of hosts from ruminant livestock species to wild ruminants, camelids, marsupials, primates, birds and reptiles. Although gut methanogens are very diverse, they tend to be limited to specific phylogenetic groups. Overall, methanogens related to species of the genus Methanobrevibacter are the most highly represented archaea in the gut of herbivores. However, under certain conditions, archaea from more phylogenetically distant groups are the most prevalent, such as methanogens belonging to either the genus Methanosphaera, the order Methanomicrobiales or the Thermoplasmatales-Affiliated Lineage C Comparisons not only highlight the strong influence of host species and diet in the determination of the population structure of symbiotic methanogens, but also reveal other complex relationships, such as wide differences between breeds, as well as unexpected similarities between unrelated species. These observations strongly support the need for high throughput sequencing and metagenomic studies to gain further insight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1751731112000912

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • Methane emissions from cattle

    Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “First, enteric production of methane has a negative impact on animal productivity, resulting in lost energy ranging from 2% to 12% of the animal’s gross energy intake (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Chaudhary PP and Sirohi SK 2009. Dominance of Methanomicrobium phylotype in methanogen population present in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Letters in Applied Microbiology 49, 274-277.
  2. Espinoza RE, Wiens JJ and Tracy CR 2004. Recurrent evolution of herbivory in small, cold-climate lizards: breaking the ecophysiological rules of reptilian herbivory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 16819-16824.
  3. Facey HV, Northwood KS and Wright A-DG 2012. Molecular diversity of methanogens in fecal samples from zoo captive Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii). American Journal of Primatology 74, 408-413.
  4. Franzolin R, St-Pierre B, Northwood K and Wright A-DG 2012. Analysis of rumen methanogen diversity in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) under three different diets. Microbial Ecology (in press); doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0007-0. · DOI
  5. Fricke WF, Seedorf H, Henne A, Kruer M, Liesegang H, Hedderich R, Gottschalk G and Thauer RK 2006. The genome sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmanae reveals why this human intestinal archaeon is restricted to methanol and H 2 for methane formation and ATP synthesis. Journal of Bacteriology 188, 642-658.
  6. Hong PY, Wheeler E, Cann IKO and Mackie RI 2011. Phylogenetic analysis of the fecal microbial community in herbivorous land and marine iguanas of the Gala ´pagos Islands using 16S rRNA-based pyrosequencing. ISME Journal 5, 1461-1470.
  7. Liu Y and Whitman WB 2008. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1125, 171-189.
  8. Nakamura N, Amato KR, Garber P, Estrada A, Mackie RI and Gaskins HR 2011. Analysis of the hydrogenotrophic microbiota of wild and captive black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) in palenque national park, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology 73, 909-919.
  9. Prothero DR and Schoch RM 2002. Tylopods. In Horns, tusks, and flippers: the evolution of hoofed mammals (ed. DR Prothero and RM Schoch), pp. 45-56.
  10. Shepherd SA and Hawkes MW 2005. Algal food preferences and seasonal foraging strategy of the marine iguana, Amblyrhynchus cristatus, on Santa Cruz, Galapagos. Bulletin of Marine Science 77, 51-72.
  11. Skillman LC, Evans PN, Strompl C and Joblin KN 2006. 16S rDNA directed PCR primers and detection of methanogens in the bovine rumen. Letters in Applied Microbiology 42, 222-228.
  12. Stevens CE and Hume ID 1995. Comparative physiology of the vertebrate digestive system, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  13. Turnbull KL, Smith RP, St-Pierre B and Wright A-DG 2012. Molecular diversity of methanogens in fecal samples from Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) at two zoos. Research in Veterinary Science; doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.1008. 1013. · DOI
  14. Wolin MJ 1979. The rumen fermentation: a model for microbial interactions in anaerobic ecosystems. In Advances in Microbial Ecology (ed. M Alexander), vol. 3, pp. 49-77. Plenum Press, New York and London.
  15. Wright A-DG, Northwood KS and Obispo NE 2009. Rumen-like methanogens identified from the crop of the folivorous South American bird, the hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin). ISME Journal 3, 1120-1126.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
St-Pierre, B., & Wright, A.-D. G.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, A.-D.G.
Venue
Animal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
49-56
ISSN
1751-7311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163047566
Cited by
98
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
19.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • animal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
methanogenic archaea, herbivores, ruminants, methane production, Methanobrevibacter, Methanosphaera, Methanomicrobiales, Thermoplasmatales, livestock breeds, wild ruminants, camelids, marsupials, primates, birds, reptiles, 16S rRNA gene diversity
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Birds, Mammals, Methane, Reptiles, Species Specificity, Gastrointestinal Tract, Herbivory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review