The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect
Open accessAbstract
Research in judgment and decision making generally ignores the distinction between factual and subjective feelings of ownership, tacitly assuming that the two correspond closely. The present research suggests that this assumption might be usefully reexamined. In two experiments on the endowment effect we examine the role of subjective ownership by independently manipulating factual ownership (i.e., what participants were told about ownership) and physical possession of an object. This allowed us to disentangle the effects of these two factors, which are typically confounded. We found a significant effect of possession, but not of factual ownership, on monetary valuation of the object. Moreover, this effect was mediated by participants’ feelings of ownership, which were enhanced by the physical possession of the object. Thus, the endowment effect did not rely on factual ownership per se but was the result of subjective feelings of ownership induced by possession of the object. It is these feelings of ownership that appeared to lead individuals to include the object into their endowment and to shift their reference point accordingly. Potential implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,505
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,320
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194 · cited 1×
“The effect has since been widely replicated (e.g., Kahneman, Knetsch, & Thaler, 1990; Kahneman, Knetsch, & Thaler, 1991).”
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2000) · Behavioral Law and Economics · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175197.009 · Cited by 2,873
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4 · Cited by 2,573 · cited 2×
“…could examine the role of subjective ownership in the escalation of commitment to failing projects (Staw, 1976) and failure to disregard sunk costs (Arkes & Blumer, 1985), which may well involve decision makers’ subjective ownership of a project and a resulting feeling that one must take care of…”
Background
Cited by
The “I Designed It Myself” Effect in Mass Customization
Franke, N., Schreier, M., & Kaiser, U. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1077 · Cited by 760
Shu, S. B., & Peck, J. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002 · Cited by 418
Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003 · Cited by 383
Digital Goods Are Valued Less Than Physical Goods
Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx102 · Cited by 323
A psychological ownership approach to designing object attachment
Baxter, W. L., Aurisicchio, M., & Childs, P. R. N. (2015) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2015.1030371 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Reb, J., & Connolly, T.
- Venue
- Judgment and Decision Making
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-114
- ISSN
- 1930-2975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124161016
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1930297500000085
- The paper
- Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500000085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.