Cited by 99Mental Health Treatment and AccessCultural Competency in Health CarePsychology and Mental Health

Reducing mental health-related stigma in primary health care settings in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Open access
Heim, E., Kohrt, B. A., Koschorke, M., Milenova, M., Thornicroft, G.·2020·Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Abstract

Aims: This systematic review compiled evidence on interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma in primary health care (PHC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Studies targeting PHC staff (including non-professionals) were included. Primary outcomes were stigmatising attitudes and discriminatory behaviours. Methods: Data collection included two strategies. First, previous systematic reviews were searched for studies that met the inclusion criteria of the current review. Second, a new search was done, covering the time since the previous reviews, i.e. January 2013 to May 2017. Five search concepts were combined in order to capture relevant literature: stigma, mental health, intervention, PHC staff and LMICs. A qualitative analysis of all included full-texts was done with software MAXQDA. Full-texts were analysed with regards to the content of interventions, didactic methods, mental disorders, cultural adaptation, type of outcome measure and primary outcomes. Furthermore, a risk of bias assessment was undertaken. Results: A total of 18 studies were included. Risk of bias was rated as high in most included studies. Only six studies had tested their intervention against a control condition, two of which had used random allocation. Most frequently used interventions were lectures providing theoretical information. Many studies also used interactive methods ( N = 9), discussed case studies ( N = 8) or used role plays ( N = 5). Three studies reported that they had used clinical practice and supervision. Results of these studies were mixed. No or little effects were found for brief training interventions (e.g. 1 h to 1 day). Longer training interventions with more sophisticated didactic methods produced statistically significant changes in validated stigma questionnaires. These results have to be interpreted with caution due to risk of bias. Methods for cultural adaptation of interventions were rarely documented. Conclusions: More rigorous trials are needed in LMICs to test interventions that target discriminatory behaviours in relationship with patients. Cultural adaptation of stigma interventions and structural/institutional factors should be more explicitly addressed in such trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s2045796018000458

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many places, mental illness is stigmatized and stigma against transgender people is also highly prevalent, creating a 'double stigma' burden for this community.

    “In many places, mental illness is stigmatized [129, 130] and stigma against transgender people is also highly prevalent [131, 132], creating a ‘double stigma’ burden for this community.”
  • Recent studies have identified several putative treatment selection brain biotypes with potential utility for choosing between psychotherapy and medication and for stimulation-based treatments such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation.

    “Recent studies implementing this general approach have identified several putative treatment selection brain biotypes with potential utility for choosing between psychotherapy and medication and for stimulation-based treatments such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation. 333,336”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO (2008) mhGAP: Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up Care for Mental, Neurological and Substance use Disorders. Geneva: WHO. 26290926

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heim, E., Kohrt, B. A., Koschorke, M., Milenova, M., & Thornicroft, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heim, E.
Venue
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Published
2018-09-04
Volume
29
Pages
e3-e3
ISSN
  • 2045-7960 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7979
OpenAlex
W2890726333
Cited by
99
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 7
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (FP7/2007–2013, CL-2012-17-003)
  • King's College London
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/R023697/1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH104310, K01MH104310 and R21MH111280, R21MH111280)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental health stigma, stigma reduction interventions, primary care, healthcare workers, discriminatory behavior, stigmatizing attitudes, low- and middle-income countries, employee training, role play, case-based training, cultural adaptation, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Humans, Primary Health Care, Stereotyping, Social Stigma, Social Discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review