Cited by 206Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity Studies

Stigma and discrimination related to mental illness in low- and middle-income countries

Open access
Semrau, M., Evans-Lacko, S., Koschorke, M., Ashenafi, L., Thornicroft, G.·2015·Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Abstract

AIMS: This paper aims to provide an overview of evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs) worldwide to address: the nature of stigma and discrimination, relevant context-specific factors, global patterns of these phenomena and their measurement and quantitative and qualitative evidence of interventions intended to reduce their occurrence and impact. The background to this study is that the large majority of studies concerned with identifying effective interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination originate in high-income countries (HICs). This paper therefore presents such evidence from, and relevant to, LAMICs. METHODS: Conceptual overview of the relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature on stigma and discrimination related to mental illness in LAMICs are available in English, Spanish, French and Russian. RESULTS: Few intervention studies were identified related to stigma re-education in LAMICs. None of these addressed behaviour change/discrimination, and there were no long-term follow-up studies. There is therefore insufficient evidence at present to know which overall types of intervention may be effective and feasible and in LAMICs, how best to target key groups such as healthcare staff, and how far they may need to be locally customised to be acceptable for large-scale use in these settings. In particular, forms of social contacts, which have been shown to be the most effective intervention to reduce stigma among adults in HICs, have not yet been assessed sufficiently to know whether these methods are also effective in LAMICs. CONCLUSION: Generating information about effective interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination in LAMICs is now an important mental health priority worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s2045796015000359

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO (1979). Schizophrenia: An International Follow-up Study. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Semrau, M., Evans-Lacko, S., Koschorke, M., Ashenafi, L., & Thornicroft, G.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Thornicroft, G.
Venue
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Published
2015-05-04
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
382-394
ISSN
  • 2045-7960 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7979
OpenAlex
W1958429804
Cited by
206
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
22.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (100714)
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (FP7/2007–2013, CL-2012-17-003)
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
mental health stigma, discrimination against people with mental illness, low- and middle-income countries, stigma reduction interventions, clinician attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review