Cited by 20Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesClimate Change and Environmental ImpactClimate variability and models

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential feedbacks between loss of biosphere integrity and climate change

Open access

Abstract

Non-technical abstract: Individual organisms on land and in the ocean sequester massive amounts of the carbon emitted into the atmosphere by humans. Yet the role of ecosystems as a whole in modulating this uptake of carbon is less clear. Here, we study several different mechanisms by which climate change and ecosystems could interact. We show that climate change could cause changes in ecosystems that reduce their capacity to take up carbon, further accelerating climate change. More research on – and better governance of – interactions between climate change and ecosystems is urgently required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/sus.2019.18

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional or more extensive transgression of one planetary boundary can change risk gradients for other boundaries.

    “Recent studies (13, 14, 21, 22) have shown that additional or more extensive transgression of one planetary boundary can change risk gradients for other boundaries.”

    From Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. 10.5194/gmd-11-409-2018 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1813723116 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.baae.2017.06.002 · DOI
  4. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0997 · DOI
  5. 10.5194/gmd-11-1343-2018 · DOI
  6. 10.3732/ajb.1200469 · DOI
  7. Koven, 2015, A simplified, data-constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon–climate feedback, Philosophical Transactions. Series A. Methematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 373
  8. 10.1038/nclimate3262 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00224-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.5194/gmd-11-121-2018 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41561-018-0227-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1805518115 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167771 · DOI
  14. 10.1098/rspb.2018.0038 · DOI
  15. 10.1029/2000GL012015 · DOI
  16. Miles L. , Dunning E. , Doswald N. , & Osti M. (2010). A safer bet for REDD+: review of the evidence on the relationship between biodiversity and the resilience of forest carbon stocks. Working Paper v2. Multiple Benefits Series, 10. Prepared on behalf of the UN-REDD Programme. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
  17. 10.1038/nature10548 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/ngeo2854 · DOI
  19. 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1996.t01-2-00006.x · DOI
  20. 10.1111/gcb.13429 · DOI
  21. 10.1175/2011JCLI3898.1 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature26152 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/ele.13145 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s10584-010-9838-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00323.x · DOI
  28. 10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/085003 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.171315998 · DOI
  30. 10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094011 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/431913a · DOI
  32. van der Plas, 2019, Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities, Biological Reviews, 94, 1220, 10.1111/brv.12499 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.02.001 · DOI
  34. 10.5194/gmd-10-959-2017 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014 · DOI
  37. 10.1890/080005 · DOI
  38. 10.1175/2009JCLI2949.1 · DOI
  39. Settele, 2015, Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 271
  40. 10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013 · DOI
  41. Ahlström, 2015, Importance of vegetation dynamics for future terrestrial carbon cycling, Environmental Research Letters, 10
  42. Ciais, 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 465
  43. 10.1073/pnas.0913855107 · DOI
  44. Díaz, 2009, Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing – An Ecological and Economic Perspective
  45. Collins, 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1029
  46. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.aaa1788 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.tree.2015.05.002 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.05.002 · DOI
  50. 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1 · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.292.5517.673 · DOI
  52. 10.5194/gmd-10-271-2017 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/ngeo3031 · DOI
  54. 10.5194/tc-10-2291-2016 · DOI
  55. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.057 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.1409853112 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/493295a · DOI
  59. 10.1175/JCLI3800.1 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1177/2053019616688022 · DOI
  61. 10.1038/nature08649 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/srep39102 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.009 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z · DOI
  65. 10.5194/acp-11-1457-2011 · DOI
  66. 10.1126/sciadv.aar6603 · DOI
  67. 10.1126/science.1196624 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1038/s41598-018-23763-y · DOI
  69. 10.1029/98GL01908 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00285.x · DOI
  71. 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 · DOI
  73. 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1537:ECOBLT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  74. 10.1126/science.aaf2201 · DOI
  75. 10.1073/pnas.1413090112 · DOI
  76. 10.2307/2997570 · DOI
  77. 10.4319/lo.2004.49.4_part_2.1269 · DOI
  78. 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:AWCWWS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  79. 10.1038/35038000 · DOI
  80. 10.1111/geb.12364 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.5194/esd-4-31-2013 · DOI
  82. 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00521.x · DOI
  83. 10.5194/esd-9-507-2018 · DOI
  84. 10.1007/978-3-540-32730-1_15 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/nature10386 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.3354/meps12960 · DOI
  87. 10.5194/bg-12-3469-2015 · DOI
  88. 10.1038/ncomms13106 · DOI
  89. 10.1038/nature14338 · DOI
  90. 10.5751/ES-01818-110225 · DOI
  91. House, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, 355
  92. 10.5194/esd-7-611-2016 · DOI
  93. 10.1002/2013GB004684 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries

    Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Drüke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., von Bloh, W., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 · Cited by 3,311

    “The known interdependence of planetary boundaries is confirmed by Earth system science understanding (14, 22) of the planet as an integrated, partially self-regulating, system.”
    Self-citation

Metadata

Authors
Lade, S. J., Norberg, J., Anderies, J. M., Beer, C., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Gasser, T., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., & Steffen, W.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Lade, Steven J.
Venue
Global Sustainability
Published
2019
Volume
2
ISSN
2059-4798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987043551
Cited by
20
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BE6485/1-1)
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2014-589)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Earth League
  • Stordalen Foundation
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
  • H2020 European Research Council (743080)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (610028)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
biosphere integrity, climate change, ecosystem carbon sequestration, feedback, ecosystem resilience, climate governance, planetary boundaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review