The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs
Abstract
Current methodologies for protein quantitation include 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis techniques, metabolic labeling, and stable isotope labeling methods to name only a few. The current literature illustrates both pros and cons for each of the previously mentioned methodologies. Keeping with the teachings of William of Ockham, "with all things being equal the simplest solution tends to be correct", a simple LC/MS based methodology is presented that allows relative changes in abundance of proteins in highly complex mixtures to be determined. Utilizing a reproducible chromatographic separations system along with the high mass resolution and mass accuracy of an orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometer, the quantitative comparison of tens of thousands of ions emanating from identically prepared control and experimental samples can be made. Using this configuration, we can determine the change in relative abundance of a small number of ions between the two conditions solely by accurate mass and retention time. Employing standard operating procedures for both sample preparation and ESI-mass spectrometry, one typically obtains under 5 ppm mass precision and quantitative variations between 10 and 15%. The principal focus of this paper will demonstrate the quantitative aspects of the methodology and continue with a discussion of the associated, complementary qualitative capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.
Kojima, K.-I. (1969) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 3,648
Matuszewski, B. K., Constanzer, M. L., & Chavez-Eng, C. M. (1998) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac971078+ · Cited by 880
Mathematical Classification and Clustering
Mirkin, B. (1996) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0457-9 · Cited by 464
Metabolic labeling of C. elegans and D. melanogaster for quantitative proteomics
Krijgsveld, J., Ketting, R. F., Mahmoudi, T., Johansen, J., Artal-Sanz, M., Verrijzer, C. P., Plasterk, R. H. A., & Heck, A. J. R. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt848 · Cited by 408
18 O Labeling: a tool for proteomics
Stewart, I. I., Thomson, T., & Figeys, D. (2001) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.525 · Cited by 327
Müller, C., Schäfer, P., Störtzel, M., Vogt, S., & Weinmann, W. (2002) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/s1570-0232(02)00142-3 · Cited by 253
Radulovic, D., Jelveh, S., Ryu, S., Hamilton, T. G., Foss, E., Mao, Y., & Emili, A. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400061-mcp200 · Cited by 207
Shotgun collision‐induced dissociation of peptides using a time of flight mass analyzer
Purvine, S., Eppel*, J., Yi, E. C., & Goodlett, D. R. (2003) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200300362 · Cited by 191
Global internal standard technology for comparative proteomics
Chakraborty, A., & Regnier, F. E. (2002) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00047-x · Cited by 184
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Using a MALDI Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer
Griffin, T. J., Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Aebersold, R., Loboda, A., Jilkine, A., Ens, W., & Standing, K. G. (2001) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac001169y · Cited by 179
Cited by
Absolute Quantification of Proteins by LCMSE
Silva, J. C., Gorenstein, M. V., Li, G.-Z., Vissers, J. P. C., & Geromanos, S. J. (2006) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500230-mcp200 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationProtein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Leung, Y. H., Ng, A. M. C., Xu, X., Shen, Z., Gethings, L. A., Wong, M. T., Chan, C. M. N., Guo, M. Y., Ng, Y. H., Djurišić, A. B., et al. (2014) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201302434 · Cited by 566
Drift time-specific collision energies enable deep-coverage data-independent acquisition proteomics
Distler, U., Kuharev, J., Navarro, P., Levin, Y., Schild, H., & Tenzer, S. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2767 · Cited by 481
Gilar, M., Olivova, P., Daly, A. E., & Gebler, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.200500116 · Cited by 425
Meier, F., Beck, S., Grassl, N., Lubeck, M., Park, M. A., Raether, O., & Mann, M. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00932 · Cited by 423
A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomics
HUPO Test Sample Working Group, Bell, A. W., Deutsch, E. W., Au, C. E., Kearney, R. E., Beavis, R., Sechi, S., Nilsson, T., & Bergeron, J. J. M. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1333 · Cited by 351
Boudina, S., Bugger, H., Sena, S., O'Neill, B. T., Zaha, V. G., Ilkun, O., Wright, J. J., Mazumder, P. K., Palfreyman, E., Tidwell, T. J., et al. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.792101 · Cited by 301
Multiplexed and data‐independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling
Chapman, J. D., Goodlett, D. R., & Masselon, C. D. (2014) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21400 · Cited by 259
Advances in targeted proteomics and applications to biomedical research
Shi, T., Song, E., Nie, S., Rodland, K. D., Liu, T., Qian, W., & Smith, R. D. (2016) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201500449 · Cited by 257
Rosenberger, G., Bludau, I., Schmitt, U., Heusel, M., Hunter, C. L., Liu, Y., MacCoss, M. J., MacLean, B. X., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Pedrioli, P. G. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4398 · Cited by 203
In planta anthocyanin degradation by a vacuolar class III peroxidase in Brunfelsia calycina flowers
Zipor, G., Duarte, P., Carqueijeiro, I., Shahar, L., Ovadia, R., Teper‐Bamnolker, P., Eshel, D., Levin, Y., Doron‐Faigenboim, A., Sottomayor, M., et al. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13038 · Cited by 143
Wu, Q., Yuan, H., Zhang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2012) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2012.04.010 · Cited by 94
Small colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus reveal distinct protein profiles
Kriegeskorte, A., König, S., Sander, G., Pirkl, A., Mahabir, E., Proctor, R. A., von Eiff, C., Peters, G., & Becker, K. (2011) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201000796 · Cited by 89
Monitoring process-related impurities in biologics–host cell protein analysis
Pilely, K., Johansen, M. R., Lund, R. R., Kofoed, T., Jørgensen, T. K., Skriver, L., & Mørtz, E. (2022) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-021-03648-2 · Cited by 78
Rodríguez-Suárez, E., Gonzalez, E., Hughes, C., Conde-Vancells, J., Rudella, A., Royo, F., Palomo, L., Elortza, F., Lu, S. C., Mato, J. M., et al. (2014) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2014.04.008 · Cited by 76
Jacob, L., Combes, F., & Burger, T. (2019) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxy021 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Silva, J. C., Denny, R., Dorschel, C. A., Gorenstein, M., Kass, I. J., Li, G.-Z., McKenna, T., Nold, M. J., Richardson, K., Young, P., & Geromanos, S.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-03-02
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2187-2200
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1975414887
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
