The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Spectrometry Identifiable Cross-Linking Strategy for Studying Protein−Protein Interactions
Abstract
A new mass spectrometry identifiable cross-linking strategy has been developed to study protein-protein interactions. The new cross-linker was designed to have two low-energy MS/MS-cleavable bonds in the spacer chain to provide three primary benefits: First, a reporter tag can be released from cross-link due to cleavage of the two labile bonds in the spacer chain. Second, a relatively simple MS/MS spectrum can be generated owing to favorable cleavage of labile bonds. And finally, the cross-linked peptide chains are dissociated from each other, and each then can be fragmented separately to get sequence information. Therefore, this novel type of cross-linker was named protein interaction reporter (PIR). To this end, two RINK groups were utilized to make our first-generation cross-linker using solid-phase peptide synthesis chemistry. The RINK group contains a bond more labile than peptide bonds during low-energy activation. The new cross-linker was applied to cross-link ribonuclease S (RNase S), a noncovalent complex of S-peptide and S-protein. The results demonstrated that the new cross-linker effectively reacted with RNase S to generate various types of cross-linked products. More importantly, the cross-linked peptides successfully released reporter ions during selective MS/MS conditions, and the dissociated peptide chains remained intact during MS(2), thus enabling MS(3) to be performed subsequently. In addition, dead-end, intra-, and inter-cross-linked peptides can be distinguished by analyzing MS/MS spectra.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lanman, J., Lam, T. T., Barnes, S., Sakalian, M., Emmett, M. R., Marshall, A. G., & Prevelige, P. E. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01245-7 · Cited by 206
Cited by
Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry
Gingras, A.-C., Gstaiger, M., Raught, B., & Aebersold, R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2208 · Cited by 708
Sinz, A. (2006) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20082 · Cited by 648
Probing Native Protein Structures by Chemical Cross-linking, Mass Spectrometry, and Bioinformatics
Leitner, A., Walzthoeni, T., Kahraman, A., Herzog, F., Rinner, O., Beck, M., & Aebersold, R. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r000001-mcp201 · Cited by 458
Rappsilber, J. (2011) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2010.10.014 · Cited by 422
Protein Complexes in the Gas Phase: Technology for Structural Genomics and Proteomics
Benesch, J. L. P., Ruotolo, B. T., Simmons, D. A., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068289b · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, X., Munske, G. R., Siems, W. F., & Bruce, J. E.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-11-24
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 311-318
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2072343913
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mass Spectrometry Identifiable Cross-Linking Strategy for Studying Protein−Protein Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0488762
- The paper
- Tang, X., Munske, G. R., Siems, W. F., & Bruce, J. E. (2005). Mass Spectrometry Identifiable Cross-Linking Strategy for Studying Protein−Protein Interactions. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0488762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.