The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On-Chip Free-Flow Magnetophoresis: Continuous Flow Separation of Magnetic Particles and Agglomerates
Abstract
The separation of magnetic microparticles was achieved by on-chip free-flow magnetophoresis. In continuous flow, magnetic particles were deflected from the direction of laminar flow by a perpendicular magnetic field depending on their magnetic susceptibility and size and on the flow rate. Magnetic particles could thus be separated from each other and from nonmagnetic materials. Magnetic and nonmagnetic particles were introduced into a microfluidic separation chamber, and their deflection was studied under the microscope. The magnetic particles were 2.0 and 4.5 microm in diameter with magnetic susceptibilities of 1.12 x 10(-4) and 1.6 x 10(-4) m(3) kg(-1), respectively. The 4.5-microm particles with the larger susceptibility were deflected further from the direction of laminar flow than the 2.0-microm magnetic particles. Nonmagnetic 6-microm polystyrene beads, however, were not deflected at all. Furthermore, agglomerates of magnetic particles were found to be deflected to a larger extent than single magnetic particles. The applied flow rate and the strength and gradient of the applied magnetic field were the key parameters in controlling the deflection. This separation method has a wide applicability since magnetic particles are commonly used in bioanalysis as a solid support material for antigens, antibodies, DNA, and even cells. Free-flow magnetophoretic separations could be hyphenated with other microfluidic devices for reaction and analysis steps to form a micro total analysis system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications
Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., & Zengerle, R. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b820557b · Cited by 1,647
Surface acoustic wave microfluidics
Ding, X., Li, P., Lin, S.-C. S., Stratton, Z. S., Nama, N., Guo, F., Slotcavage, D., Mao, X., Shi, J., Costanzo, F., et al. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50361e · Cited by 926
Combined microfluidic-micromagnetic separation of living cells in continuous flow
Xia, N., Hunt, T. P., Mayers, B. T., Alsberg, E., Whitesides, G. M., Westervelt, R. M., & Ingber, D. E. (2006) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-006-0033-0 · Cited by 371
Spinning magnetic trap for automated microfluidic assay systems
Verbarg, J., Kamgar-Parsi, K., Shields, A. R., Howell, P. B., & Ligler, F. S. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc21189k · Cited by 39
Magnetofluidic micromixer based on a complex rotating magnetic field
Munaz, A., Kamble, H., Shiddiky, M. J. A., & Nguyen, N.-T. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra08073e · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Pamme, N., & Manz, A.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-11-18
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7250-7256
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2094711567
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On-Chip Free-Flow Magnetophoresis: Continuous Flow Separation of Magnetic Particles and Agglomerates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac049183o
- The paper
- Pamme, N., & Manz, A. (2004). On-Chip Free-Flow Magnetophoresis: Continuous Flow Separation of Magnetic Particles and Agglomerates. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac049183o
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.