The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated MALDI Matrix Deposition Method with Inkjet Printing for Imaging Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Careful matrix deposition on tissue samples for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) is critical for producing reproducible analyte ion signals. Traditional methods for matrix deposition are often considered an art rather than a science, with significant sample-to-sample variability. Here we report an automated method for matrix deposition, employing a desktop inkjet printer (<$200) with 5760 x 1440 dpi resolution and a six-channel piezoelectric head that delivers 3 pL/drop. The inkjet printer tray, designed to hold CDs and DVDs, was modified to hold microscope slides. Empty ink cartridges were filled with MALDI matrix solutions, including DHB in methanol/water (70:30) at concentrations up to 40 mg/mL. Various samples (including rat brain tissue sections and standards of small drug molecules) were prepared using three deposition methods (electrospray, airbrush, inkjet). A linear ion trap equipped with an intermediate-pressure MALDI source was used for analyses. Optical microscopic examination showed that matrix crystals were formed evenly across the sample. There was minimal background signal after storing the matrix in the cartridges over a 6-month period. Overall, the mass spectral images gathered from inkjet-printed tissue specimens were of better quality and more reproducible than from specimens prepared by the electrospray and airbrush methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS
Caprioli, R. M., Farmer, T. B., & Gile, J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970888i · Cited by 2,234
Cited by
A concise review of mass spectrometry imaging
Amstalden van Hove, E. R., Smith, D. F., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.033 · Cited by 416
MALDI Imaging of Lipid Biochemistry in Tissues by Mass Spectrometry
Zemski Berry, K. A., Hankin, J. A., Barkley, R. M., Spraggins, J. M., Caprioli, R. M., & Murphy, R. C. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200280p · Cited by 386
Mass spectrometry imaging for drug distribution studies
Prideaux, B., & Stoeckli, M. (2012) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.07.028 · Cited by 279
Proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry
Casadonte, R., & Caprioli, R. M. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.388 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Baluya, D. L., Garrett, T. J., & Yost, R. A.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-07-21
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6862-6867
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2086154926
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated MALDI Matrix Deposition Method with Inkjet Printing for Imaging Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac070958d
- The paper
- Baluya, D. L., Garrett, T. J., & Yost, R. A. (2007). Automated MALDI Matrix Deposition Method with Inkjet Printing for Imaging Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac070958d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.