Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Size Discrimination and Detection Capabilities of Single-Particle ICPMS for Environmental Analysis of Silver Nanoparticles

Tuoriniemi, Jani, Cornelis, Geert, Hassellöv, Martin·2012·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The detection capabilities of single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (spICPMS) with respect to particle size and number concentrations are investigated for the case of silver nanoparticles (ca. 20-80 nm). An iterative algorithm was developed where particle measurement events were distinguished as outliers from the more continuous dissolved ion signal if the measured intensity was more than five times the standard deviation of the whole data set. The optimal dwell time for 40-80 nm particles, limiting both incomplete and multiple particle events, was 5 ms. The smallest detectable particle size (ca. 20 nm) is mainly limited by the overlap of particle events and dissolved signal that increases with noise on both signals. The lowest measurable number concentration is limited by the relative frequency of erroneously identified particle events, a limit that can be reduced by acquiring more data points. Finally, the potential of spICPMS for environmental detection of nanoparticles is demonstrated for a wastewater treatment plant effluent sample.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac203005r

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Tuoriniemi, J., Cornelis, G., & Hassellöv, M.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
84
Issue
9
Pages
3965-3972
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2330436102
Cited by
281
References
1
FWCI
21.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.