Cited by 79Advanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Signal Enhancement in Antibody Microarrays Using Quantum Dots Nanocrystals: Application to Potential Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarker Screening

Morales-Narváez, Eden, Montón, Helena, Fomicheva, Anna, Merkoçi, Arben·2012·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The performance of cadmium-selenide/zinc-sulfide (CdSe@ZnS) quantum dots (QDs) and the fluorescent dye Alexa 647 as reporter in an assay designed to detect apolipoprotein E (ApoE) has been compared. The assay is a sandwich immunocomplex microarray that functions via excitation by visible light. ApoE was chosen for its potential as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease. The two versions of the microarray (QD or Alexa 647) were assessed under the same experimental conditions and then compared to a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) targeting ApoE. The QDs proved to be highly effective reporters in the microarrays, although their performance strongly varied in function of the excitation wavelength. At 633 nm, the QD microarray gave a limit of detection (LOD) of ~247 pg mL(-1); however, at an excitation wavelength of 532 nm, it provided a LOD of ~62 pg mL(-1), five times more sensitive than that of the Alexa microarray (~307 pg mL(-1)) and seven times more than that of the ELISA (~470 pg mL(-1)). Finally, serial dilutions from a human serum sample were assayed with high sensitivity and acceptable precision and accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac301369e

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales-Narváez, E., Montón, H., Fomicheva, A., & Merkoçi, A.
Affiliations
  • Nanobioelectronics & Biosensors Group, Catalan Institute of Nanotechnology, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Merkoçi, Arben
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2012-07-09
Volume
84
Issue
15
Pages
6821-6827
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2330767905
Cited by
79
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidad de Alicante
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
  • Universitat de Barcelona
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
quantum dots, CdSe/ZnS, antibody microarrays, apolipoprotein E, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, sandwich immunoassay, signal amplification, Alexa 647, excitation wavelength, detection limit, human serum, ELISA comparison
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Antibodies, Apolipoproteins E, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Immunoassay, Sulfides, Biomarkers, Zinc Compounds, Selenium Compounds, Cadmium Compounds, Protein Array Analysis, Quantum Dots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review