Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Resolution Enabled TMT 8-plexing

Werner, Thilo, Becher, Isabelle, Sweetman, Gavain, Doce, Carola, Savitski, Mikhail M., Bantscheff, Marcus·2012·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Isobaric mass tag-based quantitative proteomics strategies such as iTRAQ and TMT utilize reporter ions in the low-mass range of tandem MS spectra for relative quantification. The number of samples that can be compared in a single experiment (multiplexing) is limited by the number of different reporter ions that can be generated by differential stable isotope incorporation ((15)N, (13)C) across the reporter and the mass balancing parts of the reagents. Here, we demonstrate that a higher multiplexing rate can be achieved by utilizing the 6 mDa mass difference between (15)N- and (13)C-containing reporter fragments, in combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Two variants of the TMT127 and TMT129 reagents are available; these are distinguished by the position and the nature of the incorporated stable isotope in the reporter portions of the labels (TMT127L, (12)C(8)H(16)(15)N(1)(+); TMT127H, (12)C(7)(13)C(1)H(16)(14)N(1)(+); TMT129L, (12)C(6)(13)C(2)H(16)(15)N(1)(+); and TMT129H, (12)C(5)(13)C(3)H(16)(14)N(1)(+)). We demonstrate that these variants can be baseline-resolved in Orbitrap Elite higher-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra recorded with a 96 ms transient enabling comparable dynamic range, precision, and accuracy of quantification as 1 Da spaced reporter ions. The increased multiplexing rate enabled determination of inhibitor potencies in chemoproteomic kinase assays covering a wider range of compound concentrations in a single experiment, compared to conventional 6-plex TMT-based assays.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac301553x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Bantscheff M., 2007, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 389, 1017, 10.1007/s00216-007-1486-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Pflieger D., 2008, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 7, 326, 10.1074/mcp.M700282-MCP200 · DOI
  3. Przybylski C., 2010, J. Proteome Res., 9, 5118, 10.1021/pr1003888 · DOI
  4. Iwai L. K., 2010, J. Proteome Res., 9, 3135, 10.1021/pr100035b · DOI
  5. Olsen J. V., 2006, Cell, 127, 635, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Rubbi L., 2011, Sci. Signal., 4, ra18, 10.1126/scisignal.2001314 · DOI
  7. Bantscheff M., 2007, Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 1035, 10.1038/nbt1328 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bantscheff M., 2009, Drug Discovery Today, 14, 1021, 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.07.001 · DOI
  9. Patricelli M. P., 2011, Chem. Biol., 18, 699, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Remsing Rix L. L., 2009, Leukemia, 23, 477, 10.1038/leu.2008.334 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Afkarian M., 2010, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 9, 2195, 10.1074/mcp.M110.000992 · DOI
  12. Chao T. C., 2010, J. Proteomics, 73, 1641, 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.04.004 · DOI
  13. Schiess R., 2009, Mol. Oncol., 3, 33, 10.1016/j.molonc.2008.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Turtoi A., 2011, J. Proteome Res., 10, 3160, 10.1021/pr200212r · doi:10.1021/pr200212r
  15. Ye H., 2010, Mol. Cell. Biochem., 343, 91, 10.1007/s11010-010-0502-x · doi:10.1007/s11010-010-0502-x
  16. Thompson A., 2003, Anal. Chem., 75, 1895, 10.1021/ac0262560 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dayon L., 2008, Anal. Chem., 80, 2921, 10.1021/ac702422x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Giron P., 2011, J. Proteome Res., 10, 249, 10.1021/pr100535f · doi:10.1021/pr100535f
  19. Hahne H., 2012, Anal. Chem., 84, 3716, 10.1021/ac300197c · DOI
  20. Schwartz, J. C.; Syka, J. P.; Quarmby, S. T.Presented at the53rd ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry, San Antonio, TX, 2005.
  21. Han H., 2008, J. Proteome Res., 7, 3643, 10.1021/pr8001113 · DOI
  22. Phanstiel D., 2009, Anal. Chem., 81, 1693, 10.1021/ac8019202 · DOI
  23. Choe L., 2007, Proteomics, 7, 3651, 10.1002/pmic.200700316 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pichler P., 2010, Anal. Chem., 82, 6549, 10.1021/ac100890k · DOI · Paper page
  25. Thingholm T. E., 2010, J. Proteome Res., 9, 4045, 10.1021/pr100230q · DOI
  26. Kocher T., 2009, J. Proteome Res., 8, 4743, 10.1021/pr900451u · DOI
  27. Savitski M. M., 2010, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 21, 1668, 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.01.012 · DOI
  28. Viner R. I., 2009, J. Proteomics, 72, 874, 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.02.005 · DOI
  29. Pachl F., 2012, Proteomics, 12, 1328, 10.1002/pmic.201100622 · DOI
  30. Cox J., 2011, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 22, 1373, 10.1007/s13361-011-0142-8 · DOI
  31. Savitski M. M., 2011, Anal. Chem., 83, 8959, 10.1021/ac201760x · DOI

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Werner, T., Becher, I., Sweetman, G., Doce, C., Savitski, M. M., & Bantscheff, M.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
84
Issue
16
Pages
7188-7194
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2335262420
Cited by
189
References
6
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Resolution Enabled TMT 8-plexing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac301553x
The paper
Werner, T., Becher, I., Sweetman, G., Doce, C., Savitski, M. M., & Bantscheff, M. (2012). High-Resolution Enabled TMT 8-plexing. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac301553x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.