Cited by 684Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Chemoproteomics profiling of HDAC inhibitors reveals selective targeting of HDAC complexes

Bantscheff, Marcus, Hopf, Carsten, Savitski, Mikhail M, Dittmann, Antje, Grandi, Paola, Michon, Anne-Marie, Schlegl, Judith, Abraham, Yann +16 more·2011·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

The development of selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors with anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties remains challenging in large part owing to the difficulty of probing the interaction of small molecules with megadalton protein complexes. A combination of affinity capture and quantitative mass spectrometry revealed the selectivity with which 16 HDAC inhibitors target multiple HDAC complexes scaffolded by ELM-SANT domain subunits, including a novel mitotic deacetylase complex (MiDAC). Inhibitors clustered according to their target profiles with stronger binding of aminobenzamides to the HDAC NCoR complex than to the HDAC Sin3 complex. We identified several non-HDAC targets for hydroxamate inhibitors. HDAC inhibitors with distinct profiles have correspondingly different effects on downstream targets. We also identified the anti-inflammatory drug bufexamac as a class IIb (HDAC6, HDAC10) HDAC inhibitor. Our approach enables the discovery of novel targets and inhibitors and suggests that the selectivity of HDAC inhibitors should be evaluated in the context of HDAC complexes and not purified catalytic subunits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.1759

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic or pharmacological targeting of the CoREST complex enhances anti-tumour activity in mice.

    “Genetic or pharmacological targeting of the CoREST complex enhances anti-tumour activity in mice (Bantscheff et al., 2011;Xiong et al., 2020).”

    From HDACs and the epigenetic plasticity of cancer cells: target the complexity (2022) · cites this paper as Bantscheff et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bantscheff, M., Hopf, C., Savitski, M. M., Dittmann, A., Grandi, P., Michon, A.-M., Schlegl, J., Abraham, Y., Becher, I., Bergamini, G., Boesche, M., Delling, M., Dümpelfeld, B., Eberhard, D., Huthmacher, C., Mathieson, T., Poeckel, D., Reader, V., Strunk, K., Sweetman, G., Kruse, U., Neubauer, G., Ramsden, N. G., & Drewes, G.
Corresponding author
  • Bantscheff, Marcus
  • Drewes, Gerard
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2011-01-23
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
255-265
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2007139310
Cited by
659
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 49
FWCI
24.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
histone deacetylase inhibitors, chemoproteomics, hydroxamate inhibitors, bufexamac, HDAC6, HDAC10, drug selectivity, affinity capture
MeSH terms
Histone Deacetylases, Peptide Mapping, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Interaction Mapping, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review