The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Generic Extraction Method for Simultaneous Determination of Pesticides, Mycotoxins, Plant Toxins, and Veterinary Drugs in Feed and Food Matrixes
Open accessAbstract
A fast and straightforward generic procedure for the simultaneous extraction of various classes of pesticides, mycotoxins, plant toxins, and veterinary drugs in various matrixes has been developed, for subsequent analysis by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. As a first step, four existing multianalyte procedures and three newly proposed methods were compared for a test set of 172 pesticides, mycotoxins, and plant toxins spiked to a feed matrix. The new procedures, which basically involved extraction/dilution of the sample with water and an acidified organic solvent (methanol, acetonitrile, or acetone), were most promising. The three new generic extraction methods were further tested for applicability to other matrixes (maize, honey, milk, egg, meat). Overall, the best recoveries were obtained for acetone, followed by acetonitrile. With respect to matrix effects, acetonitrile was the most favorable solvent and methanol was the worst. The occurrence of matrix effects decreased for the matrixes in the order of feed > maize > meat > milk > egg > honey. The extraction method selected as the default procedure (water/acetonitrile/1% formic acid) was also evaluated for applicability to multiple classes of veterinary drugs in all six matrixes, with satisfactory results. Finally, the generic extraction procedure was validated for 136 pesticides, 36 natural toxins, and 86 veterinary drugs in compound feed and honey at three levels (0.01, 0.02, and 0.05 mg/kg) using ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) for analysis of the extracts. For over 80% of the analytes, recoveries were between 70 and 120% and precision (expressed as relative standard deviation) was mostly in the range of 5-10% (except for feed at 0.01 mg/kg; adequate recoveries for 62% of the analytes). The limits of detection were from <0.01 to 0.05 mg/kg for most analytes, which is usually sufficient to verify compliance of products with legal tolerances. The results clearly demonstrate the feasibility of the generic approach proposed. Application of the method in routine monitoring programs would imply a drastic reduction of both effort and time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sulyok, M., Berthiller, F., Krska, R., & Schuhmacher, R. (2006) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.2640 · Cited by 681
Lehotay, S. J., Kok, A. D., Hiemstra, M., & Bodegraven, P. V. (2005) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/88.2.595 · Cited by 662
Payá, P., Anastassiades, M., Mack, D., Sigalova, I., Tasdelen, B., Oliva, J., & Barba, A. (2007) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1610-7 · Cited by 642
Lehotay, S. J., Maštovská, K., & Lightfield, A. R. (2005) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/88.2.615 · Cited by 629
Matrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
Niessen, W. M. A., Manini, P., & Andreoli, R. (2006) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20097 · Cited by 435
Comprehensive screening and quantification of veterinary drugs in milk using UPLC–ToF-MS
Stolker, A. A. M., Rutgers, P., Oosterink, E., Lasaroms, J. J. P., Peters, R. J. B., van Rhijn, J. A., & Nielen, M. W. F. (2008) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-008-2168-8 · Cited by 225
Self-citationMol, H. G. J., Rooseboom, A., van Dam, R., Roding, M., Arondeus, K., & Sunarto, S. (2007) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1357-1 · Cited by 144
Self-citationNatural toxins: risks, regulations and the analytical situation in Europe
van Egmond, H. P. (2004) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-003-2373-4 · Cited by 131
Krska, R., Stubbings, G. W. F., Macarthur, R., & Crews, C. (2008) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-008-2036-6 · Cited by 127
García-Reyes, J. F., Hernando, M. D., Ferrer, C., Molina‐Díaz, A., & Fernández‐Alba, A. R. (2007) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac070855v · Cited by 125
Cited by
Pesticide residues in European agricultural soils – a hidden reality unfolded
Silva, V., Mol, H. G. J., Zomer, P., Tienstra, M., Ritsema, C. J., & Geissen, V. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.441 · Cited by 1,153
Self-citationMalachová, A., Sulyok, M., Beltrán, E., Berthiller, F., & Krska, R. (2014) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.037 · Cited by 444
Guo, B., Chen, B., Liu, A., Zhu, W., & Yao, S. (2012) · Current Drug Metabolism · doi:10.2174/138920012803341401 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Mol, H. G. J., Plaza-Bolaños, P., Zomer, P., de Rijk, T. C., Stolker, A. A. M., & Mulder, P. P. J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-11-18
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 9450-9459
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2128473659
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 36.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.