The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lys-N and Trypsin Cover Complementary Parts of the Phosphoproteome in a Refined SCX-Based Approach
Abstract
The analysis of proteome-wide phosphorylation events is still a major analytical challenge because of the enormous complexity of protein phosphorylation networks. In this work, we evaluate the complementarity of Lys-N, Lys-C, and trypsin with regard to their ability to contribute to the global analysis of the phosphoproteome. A refined version of low-pH strong cation exchange was used to efficiently separate N-terminally acetylated, phosphorylated, and nonmodified peptides. A total of 5036 nonredundant phosphopeptides could be identified with a false discovery rate of <1% from 1 mg of protein using a combination of the three enzymes. Our data revealed that the overlap between the phosphopeptide data sets generated with different proteases was marginal, whereas the overlap between two similarly generated tryptic data sets was found to be at least 4 times higher. In this way, the parallel use of Lys-N and trypsin enabled a 72% increase in the number of detected phosphopeptides as compared to trypsin alone, whereas a trypsin replicate experiment only led to a 25% increase. Thus, when focusing solely on the trypsin and Lys-N data, we identified 4671 nonredundant phosphopeptides. Further analysis of the detected sites showed that the Lys-N and trypsin data sets were enriched in significantly different phosphorylation motifs, further evidencing that multiprotease approaches are very valuable in phosphoproteome analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver
Villén, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Gerber, S. A., & Gygi, S. P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609836104 · Cited by 730
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Estimating the total number of phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteomes
Vlastaridis, P., Kyriakidou, P., Chaliotis, A., Van de Peer, Y., Oliver, S. G., & Amoutzias, G. D. (2017) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giw015 · Cited by 733
Toward a comprehensive characterization of a human cancer cell phosphoproteome
Zhou, H., Di Palma, S., Preisinger, C., Peng, M., Polat, A. N., Heck, A. J. R., & Mohammed, S. (2013) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr300630k · Cited by 438
Self-citationWiśniewski, J. R., & Mann, M. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac300006b · Cited by 299
Genome-wide characterization of the routes to pluripotency
Hussein, S. M. I., Puri, M. C., Tonge, P. D., Benevento, M., Corso, A. J., Clancy, J. L., Mosbergen, R., Li, M., Lee, D.-S., Cloonan, N., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14046 · Cited by 197
Self-citationProtease bias in absolute protein quantitation
Peng, M., Taouatas, N., Cappadona, S., van Breukelen, B., Mohammed, S., Scholten, A., & Heck, A. J. R. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2031 · Cited by 90
Self-citationThe Molecular Mechanism of Eukaryotic Elongation Factor 2 Kinase Activation
Tavares, C. D. J., Ferguson, S. B., Giles, D. H., Wang, Q., Wellmann, R. M., O'Brien, J. P., Warthaka, M., Brodbelt, J. S., Ren, P., & Dalby, K. N. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.577148 · Cited by 38
Helbig, A. O., Daran-Lapujade, P., van Maris, A. J. A., de Hulster, E. A. F., de Ridder, D., Pronk, J. T., Heck, A. J. R., & Slijper, M. (2011) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c1mb05250k · Cited by 33
Self-citationExploring the landscape of ectodomain shedding by quantitative protein terminomics
Tsumagari, K., Chang, C.-H., & Ishihama, Y. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102259 · Cited by 24
(2024) · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100820 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Gauci, S., Helbig, A. O., Slijper, M., Krijgsveld, J., Heck, A. J. R., & Mohammed, S.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-05-04
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4493-4501
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2021469232
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
