The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
o-Phenylenediamine-Modified Carbon Fiber Electrodes for the Detection of Nitric Oxide
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO.) sensors were prepared using o-phenylenediamine (o-PD) and Nafion to modify the surface of 30 microns diameter carbon fiber electrodes. These electrodes were compared with nickel porphyrin-type NO. sensors that have already been described. High-speed chronoamperometry, amperometry, and differential pulse voltammetry were used to compare the performance of sensors modified with various combinations of Nafion, o-PD, or nickel(II) meso-tetrakis(3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl) porphyrin (Ni-TMPP), in order to determine which electrodes had the most sensitivity and selectivity for NO. Our findings showed that electrodes treated with Nafion first, followed by o-PD, were very sensitive to NO., with a detection limit of 35 +/- 7 nM. In addition, o-PD electrodes were also very selective against ascorbate (> 600:1), dopamine (> 300:1), and nitrite (> 900:1). Moreover, in the range of 0-6 microM NO., o-PD electrodes displayed excellent linearity (R2 > or = 0.997). In contrast, Ni-TMPP electrodes (with Nafion) had significantly poorer detection limits (76 +/- 12 nM) and were less selective against dopamine (< 5:1) and nitrite (< 200:1). Ni-TMPP electrodes were also less linear than o-PD electrodes (R2 > or = 0.911). Finally, we tested the in vitro and in vivo performance of the o-PD electrode in terms of its ability to detect NO. release from isolated rat renal arterioles and to measure NO. diffusion in the extracellular space of the rat brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitric oxide synthases in mammals
Knowles, R. G., & Moncada, S. (1994) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2980249 · Cited by 2,752
Cited by
Biosensors for real-time in vivo measurements
Wilson, G. S., & Gifford, R. (2005) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2004.12.003 · Cited by 660
Electrochemical Monitoring of Single Cell Secretion: Vesicular Exocytosis and Oxidative Stress
Amatore, C., Arbault, S., Guille, M., & Lemaître, F. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068062g · Cited by 406
Mo, J.-W., & Ogorevc, B. (2001) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0010882 · Cited by 353
Nitric oxide is involved in growth regulation and re-orientation of pollen tubes
Prado, A. M., Porterfield, D. M., & Feijó, J. A. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01153 · Cited by 299
Compartmentalized Nanocomposite for Dynamic Nitric Oxide Release
Koehler, J. J., Zhao, J., Jedlicka, S. S., Porterfield, D. M., & Rickus, J. L. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp803276u · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedemann, M. N., Robinson, S. W., & Gerhardt, G. A.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2621-2628
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2046712488
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: o-Phenylenediamine-Modified Carbon Fiber Electrodes for the Detection of Nitric Oxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac960093w
- The paper
- Friedemann, M. N., Robinson, S. W., & Gerhardt, G. A. (1996). o-Phenylenediamine-Modified Carbon Fiber Electrodes for the Detection of Nitric Oxide. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac960093w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.