The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electron Capture Dissociation for Structural Characterization of Multiply Charged Protein Cations
Abstract
For proteins of < 20 kDa, this new radical site dissociation method cleaves different and many more backbone bonds than the conventional MS/MS methods (e.g., collisionally activated dissociation, CAD) that add energy directly to the even-electron ions. A minimum kinetic energy difference between the electron and ion maximizes capture; a 1 eV difference reduces capture by 10(3). Thus, in an FTMS ion cell with added electron trapping electrodes, capture appears to be achieved best at the boundary between the potential wells that trap the electrons and ions, now providing 80 +/- 15% precursor ion conversion efficiency. Capture cross section is dependent on the ionic charge squared (z2), minimizing the secondary dissociation of lower charge fragment ions. Electron capture is postulated to occur initially at a protonated site to release an energetic (approximately 6 eV) H. atom that is captured at a high-affinity site such as -S-S- or backbone amide to cause nonergodic (before energy randomization) dissociation. Cleavages between every pair of amino acids in mellitin (2.8 kDa) and ubiquitin (8.6 kDa) are represented in their ECD and CAD spectra, providing complete data for their de novo sequencing. Because posttranslational modifications such as carboxylation, glycosylation, and sulfation are less easily lost in ECD than in CAD, ECD assignments of their sequence positions are far more specific.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry
Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402700101 · Cited by 2,370
Automated reduction and interpretation of
Horn, D. M., Zubarev, R. A., & McLafferty, F. W. (2000) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/s1044-0305(99)00157-9 · Cited by 507
Self-citationPrecision proteomics: The case for high resolution and high mass accuracy
Mann, M., & Kelleher, N. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800788105 · Cited by 450
Self-citationMass Spectrometry: Bottom-Up or Top-Down?
Chait, B. T. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133987 · Cited by 441
Zhang, Q., Ames, J. M., Smith, R. D., Baynes, J. W., & Metz, T. O. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr800858h · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Zubarev, R. A., Horn, D. M., Fridriksson, E. K., Kelleher, N. L., Kruger, N. A., Lewis, M. A., Carpenter, B. K., & McLafferty, F. W.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-01-05
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 563-573
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2048527293
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron Capture Dissociation for Structural Characterization of Multiply Charged Protein Cations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac990811p
- The paper
- Zubarev, R. A., Horn, D. M., Fridriksson, E. K., Kelleher, N. L., Kruger, N. A., Lewis, M. A., Carpenter, B. K., & McLafferty, F. W. (2000). Electron Capture Dissociation for Structural Characterization of Multiply Charged Protein Cations. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990811p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.