The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks for Cancer Immunotherapy
Open accessAbstract
Conspectus Cancer immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBI), has revolutionized the treatment of some cancers by reactivating the antitumor immunity of hosts with durable response and manageable toxicity. However, many cancer patients with low tumor antigen exposure and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments do not respond to CBI. A variety of methods have been investigated to reverse immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments and turn “cold” tumors “hot” with the goal of extending the therapeutic benefits of CBI to a broader population of cancer patients. Immunostimulatory adjuvant treatments, such as cancer vaccines, photodynamic therapy (PDT), radiotherapy (RT), radiotherapy–radiodynamic therapy (RT-RDT), and chemodynamic therapy (CDT), promote antigen presentation and T cell priming and, when used in combination with CBI, reactivate and sustain systemic antitumor immunity. Cancer vaccines directly provide tumor antigens, while immunoadjuvant therapies such as PDT, RT, RT-RDT, and CDT kill cancer cells in an immunogenic fashion to release tumor antigens in situ. Direct administration of tumor antigens or indirect intratumoral immunoadjuvant therapies as in situ cancer vaccines initiate the immuno-oncology cycle for antitumor immune response. With the rapid growth of cancer nanotechnology in the past two decades, a large number of nanoparticle platforms have been studied, and some nanomedicines have been translated into clinical trials. Nanomedicine provides a promising strategy to enhance the efficacy of immunoadjuvant therapies to potentiate cancer immunotherapy. Among these nanoparticle platforms, nanoscale metal–organic frameworks (nMOFs) have emerged as a unique class of porous hybrid nanomaterials with metal cluster secondary building units and organic linkers. With molecular modularity, structural tunability, intrinsic porosity, tunable stability, and biocompatibility, nMOFs are ideally suited for biomedical applications, particularly cancer treatments. In this Account, we present recent breakthroughs in the design of nMOFs as nanocarriers for cancer vaccine delivery and as nanosensitizers for PDT, CDT, RT, and RT-RDT. The versatility of nMOFs allows them to be fine-tuned to effectively load tumor antigens and immunoadjuvants as cancer vaccines and significantly enhance the local antitumor efficacy of PDT, RT, RT-RDT, and CDT via generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) for in situ cancer vaccination. These nMOF-based treatments are further combined with cancer immunotherapies to elicit systemic antitumor immunity. We discuss novel strategies to enhance light tissue penetration and overcome tumor hypoxia in PDT, to increase energy deposition and ROS diffusion in RT, to combine the advantages of PDT and RT to enable RT-RDT, and to trigger CDT by hijacking aberrant metabolic processes in tumors. Loading nMOFs with small-molecule drugs such as an indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitor, the toll-like receptor agonist imiquimod, and biomacromolecules such as CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and anti-CD47 antibody synergizes with nMOF-based radical therapies to enhance their immunotherapeutic effects. Further combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors activates systemic antitumor immune responses and elicits abscopal effects. With structural and compositional tunability, nMOFs are poised to provide a new clinically deployable nanotechnology platform to promote immunostimulatory tumor microenvironments by delivering cancer vaccines, mediating PDT, enhancing RT, enabling RT-RDT, and catalyzing CDT and potentiate cancer immunotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle.
Chen, D. S., & Mellman, I. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012 · Cited by 6,929
Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment
Gajewski, T. F., Schreiber, H., & Fu, Y.-X. (2013) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2703 · Cited by 4,148
Cancer immunotherapy comes of age
Mellman, I., Coukos, G., & Dranoff, G. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10673 · Cited by 3,893
HMGB1 and RAGE in Inflammation and Cancer
Sims, G. P., Rowe, D. C., Rietdijk, S. T., Herbst, R., & Coyle, A. J. (2010) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132603 · Cited by 1,436
Schmid, P., Rugo, H. S., Adams, S., Schneeweiss, A., Barrios, C. H., Iwata, H., Diéras, V., Henschel, V., Molinero, L., Chui, S. Y., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30689-8 · Cited by 1,216
Towards personalized, tumour-specific, therapeutic vaccines for cancer
Hu, Z., Ott, P. A., & Wu, C. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2017.131 · Cited by 1,067
Ohigashi, Y., Sho, M., Yamada, Y., Tsurui, Y., Hamada, K., Ikeda, N., Mizuno, T., Yoriki, R., Kashizuka, H., Yane, K., et al. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1469 · Cited by 796
Cited by
Smart Nanomaterials in Cancer Theranostics: Challenges and Opportunities
Kashyap, B. K., Singh, V. V., Solanki, M. K., Kumar, A., Ruokolainen, J., & Kesari, K. K. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c07840 · Cited by 348
Biocompatibility and biodegradability of metal organic frameworks for biomedical applications
Singh, N., Qutub, S., & Khashab, N. M. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d1tb01044a · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Ni, K., Luo, T., Nash, G. T., & Lin, W.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-08-18
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1739-1748
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W3068332764
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 8.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks for Cancer Immunotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00313
- The paper
- Ni, K., Luo, T., Nash, G. T., & Lin, W. (2020). Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks for Cancer Immunotherapy. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.