Cited by 1,067Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkersvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Towards personalized, tumour-specific, therapeutic vaccines for cancer

Open access
Hu, Zhuting, Ott, Patrick A., Wu, Catherine J.·2018·Nature Reviews Immunology

Abstract

Cancer vaccines, which are designed to amplify tumour-specific T cell responses through active immunization, have long been envisioned as a key tool of effective cancer immunotherapy. Despite a clear rationale for such vaccines, extensive past efforts were unsuccessful in mediating clinically relevant antitumour activity in humans. Recently, however, next-generation sequencing and novel bioinformatics tools have enabled the systematic discovery of tumour neoantigens, which are highly desirable immunogens because they arise from somatic mutations of the tumour and are therefore tumour specific. As a result of the diversity of tumour neoepitopes between individuals, the development of personalized cancer vaccines is warranted. Here, we review the emerging field of personalized cancer vaccination and discuss recent developments and future directions for this promising treatment strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nri.2017.131

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, Z., Ott, P. A., & Wu, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Catherine J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Immunology
Published
2017-12-11
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
168-182
ISSN
  • 1474-1733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1741
OpenAlex
W2774113098
Cited by
1,067
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 44
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  • Melanoma Research Alliance
  • Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL103532)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA207021, 1RO1CA155010-02, R01CA155010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
cancer vaccines, personalized cancer vaccines, neoantigens, active immunotherapy, somatic mutations, cancer immunotherapy, vaccine design
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, T-Lymphocytes, Vaccination, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Cancer Vaccines, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review