Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19: Challenges and Research Needs

Open access
Feng, Wei, Newbigging, Ashley M., Le, Connie, Pang, Bo, Peng, Hanyong, Cao, Yiren, Wu, Jinjun, Abbas, Ghulam, Song, Jin, Wang, Dian-Bing, Cui, Mengmeng, Tao, Jeffrey, Tyrrell, D. Lorne, Zhang, Xian-En, Zhang, Hongquan, Le, X. Chris·2020·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 primarily relies on the detection of RNA of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the causative infectious agent of the pandemic. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) enables sensitive detection of specific sequences of genes that encode the RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), nucleocapsid (N), envelope (E), and spike (S) proteins of the virus. Although RT-PCR tests have been widely used and many alternative assays have been developed, the current testing capacity and availability cannot meet the unprecedented global demands for rapid, reliable, and widely accessible molecular diagnosis. Challenges remain throughout the entire analytical process, from the collection and treatment of specimens to the amplification and detection of viral RNA and the validation of clinical sensitivity and specificity. We highlight the main issues surrounding molecular diagnosis of COVID-19, including false negatives from the detection of viral RNA, temporal variations of viral loads, selection and treatment of specimens, and limiting factors in detecting viral proteins. We discuss critical research needs, such as improvements in RT-PCR, development of alternative nucleic acid amplification techniques, incorporating CRISPR technology for point-of-care (POC) applications, validation of POC tests, and sequencing of viral RNA and its mutations. Improved assays are also needed for environmental surveillance or wastewater-based epidemiology, which gauges infection on the community level through analyses of viral components in the community's wastewater. Public health surveillance benefits from large-scale analyses of antibodies in serum, although the current serological tests do not quantify neutralizing antibodies. Further advances in analytical technology and research through multidisciplinary collaboration will contribute to the development of mitigation strategies, therapeutics, and vaccines. Lessons learned from molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 are valuable for better preparedness in response to other infectious diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02060

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Feng, W., Newbigging, A. M., Le, C., Pang, B., Peng, H., Cao, Y., Wu, J., Abbas, G., Song, J., Wang, D.-B., Cui, M., Tao, J., Tyrrell, D. L., Zhang, X.-E., Zhang, H., & Le, X. C.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2020-06-23
Volume
92
Issue
15
Pages
10196-10209
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W3035912196
Cited by
389
References
96
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19: Challenges and Research Needs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02060
The paper
Feng, W., Newbigging, A. M., Le, C., Pang, B., Peng, H., Cao, Y., Wu, J., Abbas, G., Song, J., Wang, D.-B., Cui, M., Tao, J., Tyrrell, D. L., Zhang, X.-E., Zhang, H., & Le, X. C. (2020). Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19: Challenges and Research Needs. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02060

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.