Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analytical Challenges and Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry Based Lipidomics

Rustam, Yepy H., Reid, Gavin E.·2018·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTAnalytical Challenges and Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry Based LipidomicsYepy H. Rustam† and Gavin E. Reid*†‡§View Author Information† Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia‡ School of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia§ Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 1, 374–397Publication Date (Web):November 22, 2017Publication History Published online8 December 2017Published inissue 2 January 2018https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04836https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04836review-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2017 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views6605Altmetric-Citations223LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Ionization,Ions,Lipidomics,Lipids,Mass spectrometry Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04836

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 194 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Rustam, Y. H., & Reid, G. E.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2017-12-08
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
374-397
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2769815973
Cited by
282
References
194
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analytical Challenges and Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry Based Lipidomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04836
The paper
Rustam, Y. H., & Reid, G. E. (2018). Analytical Challenges and Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry Based Lipidomics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04836

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.