Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection and Characterization of Different Brain-Derived Subpopulations of Plasma Exosomes by Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging

Picciolini, Silvia, Gualerzi, Alice, Vanna, Renzo, Sguassero, Andrea, Gramatica, Furio, Bedoni, Marzia, Masserini, Massimo, Morasso, Carlo·2018·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The use of exosomes for diagnostic and disease monitoring purposes is becoming particularly appealing in biomedical research because of the possibility to study directly in biological fluids some of the features related to the organs from which exosomes originate. A paradigmatic example are brain-derived exosomes that can be found in plasma and used as a direct read-out of the status of the central nervous system (CNS). Inspired by recent remarkable development of plasmonic biosensors, we have designed a surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) assay that, taking advantage of the fact that exosome size perfectly fits within the surface plasmon wave depth, allows the detection of multiple exosome subpopulations of neural origin directly in blood. By use of an array of antibodies, exosomes derived from neurons and oligodendrocytes were isolated and detected with good sensitivity. Subsequently, by injecting a second antibody on the immobilized vesicles, we were able to quantify the amount of CD81 and GM1, membrane components of exosomes, on each subpopulation. In this way, we have been able to demonstrate that they are not homogeneously expressed but exhibit a variable abundance according to the exosome cellular origin. These results confirm the extreme variability of exosome composition and demonstrate how SPRi can provide an effective tool for their characterization. Besides, our work paves the road toward more precise clinical studies on the use of exosomes as potential biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00941

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Théry, 2002, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2, 569, 10.1038/nri855 · DOI
  2. Willms, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 22519, 10.1038/srep22519 · DOI
  3. Gualerzi, 2017, Sci. Rep., 7, 9820, 10.1038/s41598-017-10448-1 · DOI
  4. Camussi, 2010, Kidney Int., 78, 838, 10.1038/ki.2010.278 · DOI
  5. Tkach, 2016, Cell, 164, 1226, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yang, 2011, Clin. Dev. Immunol., 2011, 842849, 10.1155/2011/842849 · DOI
  7. Tickner, 2014, Front. Oncol., 4, 127, 10.3389/fonc.2014.00127 · DOI
  8. Quek, 2017, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 483, 1178, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.090 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lim, 2017, Acta Neuropathol. Commun., 5, 64, 10.1186/s40478-017-0467-z · DOI
  10. Soria, 2017, Front. Neurosci., 11, 26, 10.3389/fnins.2017.00026 · DOI
  11. György, 2011, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 68, 2667, 10.1007/s00018-011-0689-3 · DOI
  12. Cobelli, 2017, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1410, 57, 10.1111/nyas.13469 · DOI
  13. Zhang, 2018, Biomaterials, 156, 16, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.028 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jarmalavičiu̅tė, 2016, Pharmacol. Res., 113, 816, 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.02.002 · DOI
  15. García-Romero, 2017, Oncotarget, 8, 1416, 10.18632/oncotarget.13635 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Aryani, 2016, Mol. Neurobiol., 53, 818, 10.1007/s12035-014-9054-5 · DOI
  17. Grey, 2015, J. Biol. Chem., 290, 2969, 10.1074/jbc.M114.585703 · DOI
  18. Rajendran, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 11172, 10.1073/pnas.0603838103 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Sáenz-Cuesta, 2014, Front. Cell. Neurosci., 8, 100, 10.3389/fncel.2014.00100 · DOI
  20. Witwer, 2013, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 2, 20360, 10.3402/jev.v2i0.20360 · DOI
  21. Tang, 2017, Int. J. Mol. Med., 40, 834, 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3080 · DOI
  22. Zhu, 2014, Anal. Chem., 86, 8857, 10.1021/ac5023056 · DOI
  23. Sina, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 30460, 10.1038/srep30460 · DOI
  24. Grasso, 2015, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 407, 5425, 10.1007/s00216-015-8711-5 · DOI
  25. Di Noto, 2016, Biosens. Bioelectron., 77, 518, 10.1016/j.bios.2015.09.061 · DOI
  26. Im, 2014, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 490, 10.1038/nbt.2886 · DOI
  27. Hosseinkhani, 2017, Nanomedicine, 13, 1663, 10.1016/j.nano.2017.03.010 · DOI
  28. van der Pol, 2013, J. Thromb. Haemostasis, 11, 36, 10.1111/jth.12254 · DOI
  29. van der Pol, 2012, J. Thromb. Haemostasis, 10, 919, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04683.x · DOI
  30. Welton, 2015, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 4, 27269, 10.3402/jev.v4.27269 · DOI
  31. Mol, 2017, Nanomedicine, 13, 2061, 10.1016/j.nano.2017.03.011 · DOI
  32. Baranyai, 2015, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0145686 · DOI
  33. Gámez-Valero, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 33641, 10.1038/srep33641 · DOI
  34. Nakai, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 33935, 10.1038/srep33935 · DOI
  35. Lötvall, 2014, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 3, 26913, 10.3402/jev.v3.26913 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Stranska, 2018, J. Transl. Med., 16, 1, 10.1186/s12967-017-1374-6 · DOI
  37. Altadill, 2016, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0151339 · DOI
  38. Maiolo, 2015, Anal. Chem., 87, 4168, 10.1021/ac504861d · DOI
  39. Mustapic, 2017, Front. Neurosci., 11, 278, 10.3389/fnins.2017.00278 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Gong, 2016, J. Cell Biol., 214, 35, 10.1083/jcb.201601085 · DOI
  41. Pasquale, 2016, J. Cell Biol., 214, 5, 10.1083/jcb.201606074 · DOI
  42. Krämer-Albers, 2007, Proteomics: Clin. Appl., 1, 1446, 10.1002/prca.200700522 · DOI
  43. Yoshioka, 2013, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 2, 20424, 10.3402/jev.v2i0.20424 · DOI
  44. Shi, 2014, Acta Neuropathol., 128, 639, 10.1007/s00401-014-1314-y · DOI · Paper page
  45. Debiec, 1998, J. Cell Biol., 143, 2067, 10.1083/jcb.143.7.2067 · DOI
  46. Pancook, 1997, J. Immunol., 158, 4413, 10.4049/jimmunol.158.9.4413 · DOI
  47. Inaguma, 2016, Oncotarget, 7, 55276, 10.18632/oncotarget.10527 · DOI
  48. Talebian, 2017, Dev. Biol., 431, 179, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.09.024 · DOI
  49. Verdier, 2004, J. Pept. Sci., 10, 229, 10.1002/psc.573 · DOI
  50. Rushworth, 2010, Int. J. Alzheimer's Dis., 2011, 603052, 10.4061/2011/603052 · DOI
  51. Yanagisawa, 1995, Nat. Med., 1, 1062, 10.1038/nm1095-1062 · DOI
  52. van Echten-Deckert, 2012, Prog. Lipid Res., 51, 378, 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.07.001 · DOI
  53. Marconi, 2005, J. Neuroimmunol., 170, 115, 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.03.025 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Metadata

Authors
Picciolini, S., Gualerzi, A., Vanna, R., Sguassero, A., Gramatica, F., Bedoni, M., Masserini, M., & Morasso, C.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS , , ,
  • University of Milano-Bicocca , , ,
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2018-07-04
Volume
90
Issue
15
Pages
8873-8880
ISSN
  • 0003-2700
  • 1520-6882
Cited by
122
References
4
Language
en
Funders
Ministero della Salute

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review