Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 784

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 295 of the 295 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metal–Organic Framework-Based Enzyme Biocomposites

Liang, Weibin, Wied, Peter, Carraro, Francesco, Sumby, Christopher J., Nidetzky, Bernd, Tsung, Chia-Kuang, Falcaro, Paolo, Doonan, Christian J.·2021·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Because of their efficiency, selectivity, and environmental sustainability, there are significant opportunities for enzymes in chemical synthesis and biotechnology. However, as the three-dimensional active structure of enzymes is predominantly maintained by weaker noncovalent interactions, thermal, pH, and chemical stressors can modify or eliminate activity. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are extended porous network materials assembled by a bottom-up building block approach from metal-based nodes and organic linkers, can be used to afford protection to enzymes. The self-assembled structures of MOFs can be used to encase an enzyme in a process called encapsulation when the MOF is synthesized in the presence of the biomolecule. Alternatively, enzymes can be infiltrated into mesoporous MOF structures or surface bound via covalent or noncovalent processes. Integration of MOF materials and enzymes in this way affords protection and allows the enzyme to maintain activity in challenge conditions (e.g., denaturing agents, elevated temperature, non-native pH, and organic solvents). In addition to forming simple enzyme/MOF biocomposites, other materials can be introduced to the composites to improve recovery or facilitate advanced applications in sensing and fuel cell technology. This review canvasses enzyme protection via encapsulation, pore infiltration, and surface adsorption and summarizes strategies to form multicomponent composites. Also, given that enzyme/MOF biocomposites straddle materials chemistry and enzymology, this review provides an assessment of the characterization methodologies used for MOF-immobilized enzymes and identifies some key parameters to facilitate development of the field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01029

Cites

295 of 295 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 295 references

Cited by

See all 784

Metadata

Authors
Liang, W., Wied, P., Carraro, F., Sumby, C. J., Nidetzky, B., Tsung, C.-K., Falcaro, P., & Doonan, C. J.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2021-01-13
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
1077-1129
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W3119786711
Cited by
784
References
295
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal–Organic Framework-Based Enzyme Biocomposites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01029
The paper
Liang, W., Wied, P., Carraro, F., Sumby, C. J., Nidetzky, B., Tsung, C.-K., Falcaro, P., & Doonan, C. J. (2021). Metal–Organic Framework-Based Enzyme Biocomposites. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.