Evaporative Cooling Does Not Prevent Vertical Dispersion of Effervescent Seawater Aerosol for Brightening Clouds
Abstract
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a potential intervention to mitigate the effects of climate change by increasing the reflectance of low-level maritime clouds, including those over the Great Barrier Reef. The technique involves dispersing a plume of submicrometer seawater droplets over the ocean, which evaporate, generating nanosized sea-salt aerosols (SSAs) that disperse through the atmosphere with some fraction incorporated into clouds. Droplet evaporation, which occurs in the immediate vicinity (meters to tens of meters) of the source, has been theorized to produce a negatively buoyant plume hindering the mixing of the sea-salt aerosol to cloud height and compromising the effectiveness of MCB. We characterized in situ for the first time the nearfield aerosol dispersion from a point source of atomized seawater produced using the effervescent technique. We observed consistent vertical mixing of the plume up to 150 ± 5 m height at 1 km downwind. The extent of vertical dispersion was influenced by wind velocity and atmospheric stability. We found no evidence that negative buoyancy due to the evaporation of the 0.068 kg/s water fraction significantly suppressed vertical mixing. Our results can be attributed to the small droplet sizes generated by the effervescent spray technology and associated low flow rates required to generate around 10 14 droplets s –1 . We estimate that, for a hypothetical implementation producing up to 10 16 s –1 similarly sized SSAs, evaporative cooling is unlikely to significantly suppress the vertical dispersion of aerosol for MCB.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The GBR trials deployed mixing CPCs (MCPCs) and ultra-high sensitivity aerosol spectrometers (UHSAS) to resolve size-resolved concentrations across a wide span of aerosol particle sizes, ensuring accurate characterization of both natural and artificially generated aerosols.
“the GBR trials deployed mixing CPCs (MCPCs) and ultra-high sensitivity aerosol spectrometers (UHSAS) to resolve size-resolved concentrations across a wide span of aerosol particle sizes, ensuring accurate characterization of both natural and artificially generated aerosols (e.g., sea salt for MCB) (Hernandez-Jaramillo et al., 2023)”
From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Hernandez-Jaramillo et al., 2023
Cites
Latham, J., Bower, K., Choularton, T., Coe, H., Connolly, P., Cooper, G., Craft, T., Foster, J., Gadian, A., Galbraith, L., et al. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0086 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Wang, H., Rasch, P. J., & Feingold, G. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-4237-2011 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physical science research needed to evaluate the viability and risks of marine cloud brightening
Feingold, G., Ghate, V. P., Russell, L. M., Blossey, P., Cantrell, W., Christensen, M. W., Diamond, M. S., Gettelman, A., Glassmeier, F., Gryspeerdt, E., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi8594 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Hernandez-Jaramillo, D. C., Medcraft, C., Braga, R. C., Butcherine, P., Doss, A., Kelaher, B., Rosenfeld, D., & Harrison, D. P. (2024) · Environmental Science: Atmospheres · doi:10.1039/d4ea00009a · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationHernandez‐Galindo, I., Määttänen, A., Redmond Roche, B. H., Boucher, O., Irvine, P. J., & Moore, J. C. (2026) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2025ef007254 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…(MCPCs) and ultra‐high sensitivity aerosol spectrometers (UHSAS) to resolve size‐resolved concentrations across a wide span of aerosol particle sizes, ensuring accurate characterization of both natural and artificially generated aerosols (e.g., sea salt for MCB) (Hernandez‐Jaramillo et al., 2023).”
- Authors
- Hernandez-Jaramillo, D. C., Harrison, L., Kelaher, B., Ristovski, Z., & Harrison, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Southern Cross University (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hernandez-Jaramillo, Diana C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-11-29
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 20559-20570
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W4389125198
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Great Barrier Reef Foundation
- Australian Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Keywords
- marine cloud brightening, sea salt aerosol, evaporative cooling, cloud reflectivity, atmospheric stability, wind speed, Great Barrier Reef, climate intervention
- MeSH terms
- Aerosols, Atmosphere, Seawater, Water, Wind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review