Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Metals and Tetracycline as Selective Agents for Development of Tetracycline Resistant Bacterial Communities in Agricultural Soil

Song, Jianxiao, Rensing, Christopher, Holm, Peter E., Virta, Marko, Brandt, Kristian K.·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Environmental selection of antibiotic resistance may be caused by either antibiotic residues or coselecting agents. Using a strictly controlled experimental design, we compared the ability of metals (Cu or Zn) and tetracycline to (co)select for tetracycline resistance in bacterial communities. Soil microcosms were established by amending agricultural soil with known levels of Cu, Zn, or tetracycline known to represent commonly used metals and antibiotics for pig farming. Soil bacterial growth dynamics and bacterial community-level tetracycline resistance were determined using the [ 3 H]leucine incorporation technique, whereas soil Cu, Zn, and tetracycline exposure were quantified by a panel of whole-cell bacterial bioreporters. Tetracycline resistance increased significantly in soils containing environmentally relevant levels of Cu (≥365 mg kg -1 ) and Zn (≥264 mg kg -1 ) but not in soil spiked with unrealistically high levels of tetracycline (up to 100 mg kg -1 ). These observations were consistent with bioreporter data showing that metals remained bioavailable, whereas tetracycline was only transiently bioavailable. Community-level tetracycline resistance was correlated to the initial toxicant-induced inhibition of bacterial growth. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that toxic metals in some cases may exert a stronger selection pressure for environmental selection of resistance to an antibiotic than the specific antibiotic itself.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.6b05342

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1126/science.1159483 · DOI
  2. 10.1289/ehp.1206316 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00473-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1155157 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/srep21550 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1021/es901221x · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1222743110 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.006 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.034 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/es101798r · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.envint.2009.10.005 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.014 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/etc.3339 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.013 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/jac/dks298 · DOI
  17. WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR), 2011, Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine
  18. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.031 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.07.013 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.019 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00073-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/es803546y · DOI
  23. 10.1021/es071916+ · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0026-265X(90)90050-F · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00882.x · DOI
  26. 10.4161/bbug.1.2.10902 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/jf801797z · DOI
  28. 10.1021/ac980740e · DOI
  29. 10.1897/05-558R.1 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.040 · DOI
  31. 10.2134/jeq2007.0006 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01650.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.017 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027300 · DOI
  35. 10.1897/04-27 · DOI
  36. Kabata-Pendias A., 2011, Trace elements in soils and plants
  37. 10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500010009x · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.mib.2012.07.004 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/AEM.05352-11 · DOI
  40. 10.2134/jeq2008.0128 · DOI
  41. 10.2134/jeq2004.5050 · DOI
  42. 10.2134/jeq2015.06.0297 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/srep25312 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.tim.2014.05.005 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/1758-2229.12138 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/ismej.2016.98 · DOI
  47. 10.1021/acs.est.5b00302 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Song, J., Rensing, C., Holm, P. E., Virta, M., & Brandt, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark
  • College of Natural Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
  • Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, PL 56 Helsinki, Finland
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
3040-3047
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
Cited by
200
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Villum Fonden
  • China Scholarship Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review