Cited by 34Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Use, Storage, and Disposal of Electronic Equipment in Switzerland

Open access
Thiébaud, Esther, Hilty, Lorenz M., Schluep, Mathias, Faulstich, Martin·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Electronic devices contain important resources, including precious and critical raw materials. For an efficient management of these resources, it is important to know where the devices are located, how long they are used and when and how they are disposed of. In this article, we explore the past and current quantities of electronic devices in the in-use stock and storage stock in Switzerland and quantify the flows between the use, storage and disposal phase with dynamic material flow analysis (MFA). Devices included are mobile phones, desktop and laptop computers, monitors, cathode ray tube and flat panel display televisions, DVD players, and headphones. The system for the dynamic MFA was developed as a cascade model dividing the use phase in first, second and further use, with each of these steps consisting of an in-use stock and a storage stock for devices. Using a customized software tool, we apply Monte Carlo simulation to systematically consider data uncertainty. The results highlight the importance of the storage stock, which accounts for 25% (in terms of mass) or 40% (in terms of pieces) of the total stock of electronic devices in 2014. Reuse and storage significantly influence the total lifetime of devices and lead to wide and positively skewed lifetime distributions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.6b06336

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thiébaud, E., Hilty, L. M., Schluep, M., & Faulstich, M.
Affiliations
  • Empa (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • World Resources Forum (WRF), Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, CH-9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland
  • Clausthal University of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Thiébaud, Esther
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-03-28
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
4494-4502
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2602546964
Cited by
34
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Eidgen?ssische Materialpr?fungs- und Forschungsanstalt
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
electronic devices, electronic waste, in-use stocks, device reuse, device lifetime, dynamic material flow analysis, cascade model, mobile devices, computers, television, data uncertainty, Monte Carlo simulation, Switzerland
MeSH terms
Electronics, Microcomputers, Models, Theoretical, Refuse Disposal, Switzerland, Cathode Ray Tube

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review