Cited by 228Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Occurrence and Tissue Distribution of Novel Perfluoroether Carboxylic and Sulfonic Acids and Legacy Per/Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Black-Spotted Frog (Pelophylax nigromaculatus)

Cui, Qianqian, Pan, Yitao, Zhang, Hongxia, Sheng, Nan, Wang, Jianshe, Guo, Yong, Dai, Jiayin·2018·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Research on perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) continues to grow. However, very little is known about these substances in amphibians. Here we report for the first time on the occurrence, tissue distribution, and bioaccumulation of two novel PFASs, chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonic acid (6:2 Cl-PFESA) and hexafluoropropylene oxide trimer acid (HFPO-TA), in the black-spotted frog (Pelophylax nigromaculatus) from China. Frogs from cities with large-scale fluorochemical industries had significantly greater liver ∑PFAS levels (mean 54.28 ng/g in Changshu; 31.22 ng/g in Huantai) than those from cities without similar industry (9.91 ng/g in Zhoushan; 7.68 ng/g in Quzhou). Females had significantly lower liver PFAS levels than males, and older frogs tended to have lower PFAS levels than younger frogs. Skin, liver, and muscle contributed nearly 80% to the whole body burden of 6:2 Cl-PFESA in males, whereas the female ovary alone accounted for 58.4%. These results suggest substantial maternal transfer of 6:2 Cl-PFESA to eggs, raising concern regarding its developmental toxicity on frogs and other species. The bioaccumulation factor results (6:2 Cl-PFESA > PFOS; HFPO-TA > PFOA) suggest a stronger accumulative potential in the black-spotted frog for these alternative substances compared to their predecessors. Future studies on their toxicity and ecology risk are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b03662

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various extraction methods such as SLE, LLE, IPE, alkaline digestion and acetonitrile protein precipitation have been investigated for clean-up of multiple coexisting matrices.

    “Various extraction methods such as SLE, LLE, IPE, alkaline digestion and acetonitrile protein precipitation have been investigated for clean-up of multiple coexisting matrices [79,80,85,87].”
  • In addition to original PFAS, novel PFAS have been detected in biological samples in accordance with the phasing out of original PFAS and a shift toward manufacturing alternatives.

    “In addition to original PFAS, novel PFAS have been detected in biological samples in accordance with the phasing out of original PFAS and a shift toward manufacturing alternatives [18,78,80,82,83].”
  • HFPO-TA was found in liver samples (n=4) from only one site (Huantai) in the range 6.51-27.30 ng/g ww.

    “HFPO-TA was found in samples (n ¼ 4) from only one site (Huantai) in the range of 6.51e27.30ng/g ww.”
  • Novel PFAS 6:2 Cl-PFESA and HFPO-TA were detected in various tissues from black spotted frogs collected in a rice paddy field near a large-scale fluorochemical production site in China.

    “Novel PFAS (6:2 Cl-PFESA and HFPO-TA) were detected in various tissues from black spotted frogs collected in a rice paddy field near a large-scale fluorochemical production site in China [80].”
  • Liver samples (n=56) collected from all sampling sites contained 6:2 Cl-PFESA in the range 0.13-119 ng/g wet weight.

    “Liver samples (n ¼ 56) collected from all sampling sites contained 6:2 Cl-PFESA in the range of 0.13e119 ng/g wet weight (ww)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cui, Q., Pan, Y., Zhang, H., Sheng, N., Wang, J., Guo, Y., & Dai, J.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Dai, Jiayin
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2018-01-23
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
982-990
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2783637410
Cited by
228
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21377128, 21421002, 31320103915)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB14040202)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, Pelophylax nigromaculatus, amphibians, tissue distribution, bioaccumulation, maternal transfer, sex differences, age differences, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, environmental contamination
MeSH terms
Animals, China, Female, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Ranidae, Sulfonic Acids, Tissue Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review