Cited by 115

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laccase-Catalyzed Degradation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid

Luo, Qi, Lu, Junhe, Zhang, Hao, Wang, Zunyao, Feng, Mingbao, Chiang, Sheau-Yun Dora, Woodward, David, Huang, Qingguo·2015·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

This study examined the decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in enzyme-catalyzed oxidative humification reactions (ECOHRs). ECOHRs make up a class of reactions that are ubiquitous in the environment. Approximately 50% of PFOA in a mineral buffer solution decomposed upon addition of laccase and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole after 157 days with a pseudo-first-order rate constant of 0.0044 day –1 ( r 2 = 0.89). No shorter carbon-chain perfluorocarboxylic acids were detected as degradation products during the experiment. However, partially fluorinated shorter-chain alcohols and aldehydes were identified by high-resolution mass spectrometry. These partially fluorinated compounds were likely products resulting from PFOA degradation via a combination of free radical decarboxylation, rearrangement, and coupling processes. Fluoride was detected in the reaction solution, and the concentration indicated a 28.2% defluorination ratio during the treatment. This finding suggests that PFOA may be transformed during humification, and ECOHRs can potentially be used for the remediation of PFOA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00119

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. O’Hagan D., 2008, Chem. Soc. Rev., 37, 308, 10.1039/B711844A · DOI
  2. Buer B. C., 2012, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 4810, 10.1073/pnas.1120112109 · DOI
  3. Prevedouros K., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 32, 10.1021/es0512475 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Lau C., 2007, Toxicol. Sci., 99, 366, 10.1093/toxsci/kfm128 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Calafat A. M., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 2237, 10.1021/es062686m · DOI
  6. Betts K., 2007, Environ. Health Perspect., 115, A550
  7. Betts K. S., 2007, Environ. Health Perspect., 115, A344
  8. Takagi A., 1991, Cancer Lett., 57, 55, 10.1016/0304-3835(91)90063-N · DOI
  9. Lin H., 2012, Water Res., 46, 2281, 10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.053 · DOI
  10. Hori H., 2004, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 211, 35, 10.1016/j.molcata.2003.09.029 · DOI
  11. Cheng J., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 445, 10.1021/es902651g · DOI
  12. Tang H., 2012, Chem. Eng. J., 184, 156, 10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.020 · DOI
  13. Mitchell S. M., 2014, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 1, 117, 10.1021/ez4000862 · DOI
  14. Guggenberger G., 2005, Microorganisms in Soils: Roles in Genesis and Functions, 3, 85, 10.1007/3-540-26609-7_4 · DOI
  15. Piccolo A., 2000, Naturwissenschaften, 87, 391, 10.1007/s001140050747 · DOI
  16. Colosi L. M., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 891, 10.1021/es061616c · DOI
  17. Johannes C., 2000, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 524, 10.1128/AEM.66.2.524-528.2000 · DOI
  18. Colosi L. M., 2009, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 28, 264, 10.1897/08-282.1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Thurston C. F., 1994, Microbiology, 140, 19, 10.1099/13500872-140-1-19 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Youn H.-D., 1995, Microbiology, 141, 393, 10.1099/13500872-141-2-393 · DOI
  21. Xu F., 2000, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 2052, 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2052-2056.2000 · DOI
  22. Majcherczyk A., 1998, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 22, 335, 10.1016/S0141-0229(97)00199-3 · DOI
  23. Pozdnyakova N. N., 2006, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 39, 1242, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.03.009 · DOI
  24. Park J.-W., 1999, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 2028, 10.1021/es9810787 · DOI
  25. Yamashita N., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 5522, 10.1021/es0492541 · DOI
  26. Yu J., 2009, Water Res., 43, 2399, 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.009 · DOI
  27. Sealey J., 1998, J. Wood Chem. Technol., 18, 403, 10.1080/02773819809349588 · DOI
  28. Baiocco P., 2003, Org. Biomol. Chem., 1, 191, 10.1039/B208951C · DOI
  29. Galli C., 2004, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 17, 973, 10.1002/poc.812 · DOI
  30. Zoia L., 2010, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 23, 505, 10.1002/poc.1630 · DOI
  31. Vecitis C., 2009, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China, 3, 129, 10.1007/s11783-009-0022-7 · DOI
  32. Sangha A. K., 2012, J. Phys. Chem. B, 116, 4760, 10.1021/jp2122449 · DOI
  33. Lu J., 2009, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7062, 10.1021/es9002422 · DOI
  34. Lau C., 2007, Toxicol. Sci., 99, 366, 10.1093/toxsci/kfm128 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Cañas A. I., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 2964, 10.1021/es062328j · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Luo, Q., Lu, J., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Feng, M., Chiang, S.-Y. D., Woodward, D., & Huang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Interdisciplinary Toxicology Program, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia 30223, United States
  • College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, P. R. China
  • Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia 30602, United States
  • School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, P. R. China
  • AECOM Inc., Environment, Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • AECOM Inc., Environment, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055, United States
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2015-06-09
Volume
2
Issue
7
Pages
198-203
ISSN
2328-8930
Cited by
115
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Air Force Civil Engineer Center (FA8903-12-C-0005)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (ER-2127, FA8903-12-C-0005)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51178224)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review