Cited by 187Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAnalytical chemistry methods development

Exploring the Efficacy of Nile Red in Microplastic Quantification: A Costaining Approach

Open access
Stanton, Thomas, Johnson, Matthew, Nathanail, Paul, Gomes, Rachel L., Needham, Teresa, Burson, Amanda·2019·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

The presence of microplastic particles (<5 mm) in the environment has generated considerable concern across public, political, and scientific platforms. However, the diversity of microplastics that persist in the environment poses complex analytical challenges for our understanding of their prevalence. The use of the dye Nile red to quantify microplastics is increasingly common. However, its use in microplastic analysis rarely accounts for its affinity with the breadth of particles that occur in environmental samples. Here, we examine Nile red’s ability to stain a variety of microplastic particles and common natural and anthropogenic particles found in environmental samples. To better constrain microplastic estimates using Nile red, we test the coapplication of a second stain that binds to biological material, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). We test the potential inflation of microplastic estimates using Nile red alone by applying this costaining approach to samples of drinking water and freshwater. The use of Nile red dye alone resulted in a maximum 100% overestimation of microplastic particles. These findings are of particular significance for the public dissemination of findings from an emotive field of study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00499

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If all detected organic particles originate from plastics, the micro-nano plastic concentration could be as high as 10^6 particles per liter.

    “In this sense, if we assume all detected organic particles originate from plastics [the same assumption entailed by the quantitative result from SEM-EDX or Nile Red staining (19, 74)], the micro-nano plastic concentration could be as high as 106 particles per liter.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanton, T., Johnson, M., Nathanail, P., Gomes, R. L., Needham, T., & Burson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Land Quality Management Ltd, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, NG7 2TU Nottingham, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Stanton, Thomas
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2019-09-19
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
606-611
ISSN
2328-8930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973536280
Cited by
187
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
microplastics, Nile Red, DAPI, microplastic quantification, drinking water, freshwater, natural particles, anthropogenic particles, fluorescent staining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review