CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 97

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Xylooligosaccharides Increase Bifidobacteria and Lachnospiraceae in Mice on a High-Fat Diet, with a Concomitant Increase in Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Especially Butyric Acid

Berger, Karin, Burleigh, Stephen, Lindahl, Maria, Bhattacharya, Abhishek, Patil, Prachiti, Stålbrand, Henrik, Nordberg Karlsson, Eva, Hållenius, Frida, Nyman, Margareta, Adlercreutz, Patrick·2021·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
DOI 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c06279PMC PMC8041301
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c06279

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Weekly body weight registration. Mean ± SD. Statistical comparisons of body weight compared to the control were made using a two-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post-test.
Figure 1 Weekly body weight registration. Mean ± SD. Statistical comparisons of body weight compared to the control were made using a two-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post-test.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Unique OTUs by treatment and Bifidobacterium species by treatment. A: Total unique OTUs by treatment. Error bars represent standard deviation. Bars with different lowercase letters are statistically different from each other (p < 0.05). B: Bifidobacterium species by treatment as determined by NCBI blasting a subset of reads from each treatment (n = 100) that had been mapped to the genus Bifidobacterium as determined by the standard Qiime pipeline.
Figure 2 Unique OTUs by treatment and Bifidobacterium species by treatment. A: Total unique OTUs by treatment. Error bars represent standard deviation. Bars with different lowercase letters are statistically different from each other (p < 0.05). B: Bifidobacterium species by treatment as determined by NCBI blasting a subset of reads from each treatment (n = 100) that had been mapped to the genus Bifidobacterium as determined by the standard Qiime pipeline.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Metaphlan heat maps of families (left) and genera where possible (right) in each of the four treatments. Color based on the relative abundance scale at the top. The phylogenetic tree at the top separated the four treatments into two groups, a MIX + XOS group and an HFD + LFD group.
Figure 3 Metaphlan heat maps of families (left) and genera where possible (right) in each of the four treatments. Color based on the relative abundance scale at the top. The phylogenetic tree at the top separated the four treatments into two groups, a MIX + XOS group and an HFD + LFD group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Multivariate analysis of the four treatments, nine SCFA biomarkers, and the cecal bacteria associated with each of the samples (n = 45). Calculated as a partial-least-squares (PLS) loading scatter plot colored according to variable ID and plotted without the observation variables visible. Plotted using Simca (v. 15.0.2, Umetrics Sweden). SCFA colored purple. The explained variance from SIMCA was reported as R2X[1] = 0.23, R2X[2] = 0.11.
Figure 4 Multivariate analysis of the four treatments, nine SCFA biomarkers, and the cecal bacteria associated with each of the samples (n = 45). Calculated as a partial-least-squares (PLS) loading scatter plot colored according to variable ID and plotted without the observation variables visible. Plotted using Simca (v. 15.0.2, Umetrics Sweden). SCFA colored purple. The explained variance from SIMCA was reported as R2X[1] = 0.23, R2X[2] = 0.11.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Abundance of the genus Bifidobacterium (A), the family S24-7 (Muribaculaceae) (B), and the family Lachnospiraceae (C) in the four treatments. The barchart presents the average of normally distributed data, while the boxplots present the median of non-normal data. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Bars with different lowercase letters are statistically different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 5 Abundance of the genus Bifidobacterium (A), the family S24-7 (Muribaculaceae) (B), and the family Lachnospiraceae (C) in the four treatments. The barchart presents the average of normally distributed data, while the boxplots present the median of non-normal data. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Bars with different lowercase letters are statistically different from each other (p < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1007/s10295-019-02203-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.004 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b04811 · DOI
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080476 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127252 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/10408390903044768 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00135.x · DOI
  8. 10.22037/afb.v5i3.20212 · DOI
  9. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5361 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/jf502343v · DOI
  11. 10.1002/bmc.580 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 · DOI
  14. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02897 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/s12866-019-1494-7 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/ismej.2014.3 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/aem.02089-15 · DOI
  18. 10.3920/bm2009.0029 · DOI
  19. 10.3920/bm2009.0025 · DOI
  20. 10.3945/jn.112.172361 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/s0007114511007252 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1017/s0007114513004261 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/aem.03065-18 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/nu10081105 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/aem.02853-13 · DOI
  26. Palframan R. J., 2003, Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol., 4, 71
  27. 10.1038/srep30768 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/aem.71.10.6150-6158.2005 · DOI
  29. 10.3390/nu11102431 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41598-017-06447-x · DOI
  31. 10.1039/c8fo00209f · DOI
  32. 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00829 · DOI
  33. 10.1074/jbc.m116.746438 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00814.x · DOI
  35. 10.1128/msystems.00130-17 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/jgh.14536 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41564-018-0132-8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/s41467-019-08812-y · DOI
  39. 10.1111/1462-2920.13589 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.3382/ps/pex297 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02533.x · DOI
  42. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00979 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103622 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Berger, K., Burleigh, S., Lindahl, M., Bhattacharya, A., Patil, P., Stålbrand, H., Nordberg Karlsson, E., Hållenius, F., Nyman, M., & Adlercreutz, P.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2021-03-16
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
3617-3625
ISSN
  • 0021-8561
  • 1520-5118
DOI
10.1021/acs.jafc.0c06279
PMC
PMC8041301
Cited by
97
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsr?det Formas
  • Crafoordska Stiftelsen
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Stiftelsen f?r?Strategisk Forskning
  • Direkt?r?Albert P?hlssons Stiftelse
  • EXODIAB
  • Lawski foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review