Cited by 18Computational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyIntellectual Property and Patents

Off-Patent drug repositioning

Avram, Sorin, Curpan, Ramona, Halip, Liliana, Bora, Alina, Oprea, Tudor I.·2020·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

Drug repositioning aims to reuse "old" drugs to treat diseases outside their approved indication(s). Composition-of-matter patents and FDA exclusivities can hinder the immediate availability of some drugs to be repositioned (repurposed). Here, we analyze data from the FDA Orange Book and use current on-market patent validity and exclusivities to classify drugs into on-patent (ONP), off-patent (OFP), and off-market (OFM) sets. In the absence of an unanimously accepted definition for small molecules, these sets include organic molecules and peptides with molecular weight between 100 and 1250, which resulted in 237 ONP drugs, 320 OFM, and 996 OFP drugs, respectively. We discuss the differences between the three categories in terms of primary molecular properties, chemical diversity, mechanism-of-action target classes, and therapeutic areas and comment on the enrichment of OFP drugs in the near future. Given the intellectual property landscape, and in the absence of specific property rights, we suggest that drugs should be prioritized as follows, to improve the repositioning strategy: (i) OFP, (ii) OFM, and (iii) ONP, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00826

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avram, S., Curpan, R., Halip, L., Bora, A., & Oprea, T. I.
Affiliations
  • Romanian Academy (RO)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Oprea, Tudor I.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2020-09-02
Volume
60
Issue
12
Pages
5746-5753
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W3082453120
Cited by
18
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIH Office of the Director (U24 CA224370)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
Keywords
drug repurposing, off-patent drugs, patent validity, FDA Orange Book, small molecules, chemical diversity, mechanism of action, therapeutic areas, intellectual property, drug prioritization
MeSH terms
Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review