Cited by 496Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

REINVENT 2.0: An AI Tool for De Novo Drug Design

Open access
Blaschke, Thomas, Arús-Pous, Josep, Chen, Hongming, Margreitter, Christian, Tyrchan, Christian, Engkvist, Ola, Papadopoulos, Kostas, Patronov, Atanas·2020·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In the past few years, we have witnessed a renaissance of the field of molecular de novo drug design. The advancements in deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI) have triggered an avalanche of ideas on how to translate such techniques to a variety of domains including the field of drug design. A range of architectures have been devised to find the optimal way of generating chemical compounds by using either graph- or string (SMILES)-based representations. With this application note, we aim to offer the community a production-ready tool for de novo design, called REINVENT. It can be effectively applied on drug discovery projects that are striving to resolve either exploration or exploitation problems while navigating the chemical space. It can facilitate the idea generation process by bringing to the researcher’s attention the most promising compounds. REINVENT’s code is publicly available at https://github.com/MolecularAI/Reinvent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00915

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mature software tools now exist to run generative models on conventional computers, and community-accepted benchmarks enable systematic assessment of generated small molecules considering predicted activity, novelty, validity, and diversity.

    “Mature software tools now exist to run generative models on conventional computers,154,157 and community-accepted benchmarks enable the systematic assessment of generated small-molecules, considering not only their predicted activity but also their novelty, validity, and diversity.158,159”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. F. Pedregosa et al., "Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, pp. 2825-2830, Oct. 2011.
  2. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, "XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system," in Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, vol. 13-17- August-2016, pp. 785-794, doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaschke, T., Arús-Pous, J., Chen, H., Margreitter, C., Tyrchan, C., Engkvist, O., Papadopoulos, K., & Patronov, A.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
  • AstraZeneca , , Pepparedsleden 1 , ,
  • Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (CN)
Corresponding author
Patronov, Atanas
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2020-10-29
Volume
60
Issue
12
Pages
5918-5922
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W3094686696
Cited by
496
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 7
FWCI
23.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 676434)
  • Research Executive Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
de novo drug design, REINVENT, generative AI, chemical space exploration, graph representation, drug discovery, open source software
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Drug Design, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review