Cited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

AlphaMut: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Model to Suggest Helix-Disrupting Mutations

Open access
Bhargav, Prathith, Mukherjee, Arnab·2025·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Helices are important secondary structural motifs within proteins and are pivotal in numerous physiological processes. While amino acids (AA) such as alanine and leucine are known to promote helix formation, proline and glycine disfavor it. Helical structure formation, however, also depends on its environment, and hence, prior prediction of a mutational effect on a helical structure is difficult. Here, we employ a reinforcement learning algorithm to develop a predictive model for helix-disrupting mutations. We start with a model to disrupt helices independent of their protein environment. Our results show that only a few mutations lead to a drastic disruption of the target helix. We further extend our approach to helices in proteins and validate the results using rigorous free energy calculations. Our strategy identifies amino acids crucial for maintaining structural integrity and predicts key mutations that could alter protein structure. Through our work, we present a new use case for reinforcement learning in protein structure disruption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01387

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhargav, P., & Mukherjee, A.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IN)
Corresponding author
Mukherjee, Arnab
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2024-12-20
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
463-473
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4405649028
Cited by
2
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT/PR34215/AI/133/22/2019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein secondary structure, helix formation, deep reinforcement learning, mutation effect prediction, free energy calculation, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical, Deep Learning, Reinforcement Machine Learning, Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Protein Structure, Secondary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review