Cited by 131Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Protein function prediction as approximate semantic entailment

Open access
Kulmanov, Maxat, Guzmán-Vega, Francisco J., Duek Roggli, Paula, Lane, Lydie, Arold, Stefan T., Hoehndorf, Robert·2024·Nature Machine Intelligence

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The Gene Ontology (GO) is a formal, axiomatic theory with over 100,000 axioms that describe the molecular functions, biological processes and cellular locations of proteins in three subontologies. Predicting the functions of proteins using the GO requires both learning and reasoning capabilities in order to maintain consistency and exploit the background knowledge in the GO. Many methods have been developed to automatically predict protein functions, but effectively exploiting all the axioms in the GO for knowledge-enhanced learning has remained a challenge. We have developed DeepGO-SE, a method that predicts GO functions from protein sequences using a pretrained large language model. DeepGO-SE generates multiple approximate models of GO, and a neural network predicts the truth values of statements about protein functions in these approximate models. We aggregate the truth values over multiple models so that DeepGO-SE approximates semantic entailment when predicting protein functions. We show, using several benchmarks, that the approach effectively exploits background knowledge in the GO and improves protein function prediction compared to state-of-the-art methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-024-00795-w

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulmanov, M., Guzmán-Vega, F. J., Duek Roggli, P., Lane, L., Arold, S. T., & Hoehndorf, R.
Affiliations
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Kulmanov, Maxat
  • Hoehndorf, Robert
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2024-02-14
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
220-228
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391821988
Cited by
131
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 21 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (REI/1/5235-01-01, URF/1/4675-01-01, URF/1/4697-01-01, URF/1/5041-01-01, FCC/1/1976-46-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
protein function prediction, Gene Ontology, semantic entailment, large language models, prior knowledge, protein sequence classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review