Cited by 170Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesQuantum many-body systems

Iterative Qubit Coupled Cluster Approach with Efficient Screening of Generators

Open access
Ryabinkin, Ilya G., Lang, Robert A., Genin, Scott N., Izmaylov, Artur F.·2020·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

An iterative version of the qubit coupled cluster (QCC) method [I. G. Ryabinkin et al., J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 14, 6317] is proposed. The new method seeks to find ground electronic energies of molecules on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. Each iteration involves a canonical transformation of the Hamiltonian and employs constant-size quantum circuits at the expense of increasing the Hamiltonian size. We numerically studied the convergence of the method on ground-state calculations for LiH, H 2 O, and N 2 molecules and found that the exact ground-state energies can be systematically approached only if the generators of the QCC ansatz are sampled from a specific set of operators. We report an algorithm for constructing this set that scales linearly with the size of the Hamiltonian.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01084

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of trial circuits in certain cases can be reduced to about 5% for H2 and 10% for H2O as compared to ADAPT-VQE, using an operation pool based on the qubit coupled-cluster method.

    “The number of trial circuits in certain cases can be reduced to about 5% for H 2 and 10% for H 2 O as compared to ADAPT-VQE, using an operation pool based on the qubit coupled-cluster method (Ryabinkin et al. , 2020).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Ryabinkin et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryabinkin, I. G., Lang, R. A., Genin, S. N., & Izmaylov, A. F.
Affiliations
  • OTI Lumionics (Canada) (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Ryabinkin, Ilya G.
  • Genin, Scott N.
  • Izmaylov, Artur F.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2020-01-14
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
1055-1063
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2981617422
Cited by
170
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 11
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CRD)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
NISQ devices, ground state energy, canonical transformations, variational quantum eigensolver, lithium hydride, water, N2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review