Cited by 303Computational Drug Discovery MethodsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

How Big Is Too Big for Cell Permeability?

Open access
Matsson, Pär, Kihlberg, Jan·2017·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Understanding how to design cell permeable ligands for intracellular targets that have difficult binding sites, such as protein-protein interactions, would open vast opportunities for drug discovery. Interestingly, libraries of cyclic peptides displayed a steep drop-off in membrane permeability at molecular weights above 1000 Da and it appears likely that this cutoff constitutes an upper size limit also for more druglike compounds. However, chemical space from 500 to 1000 Da remains virtually unexplored and represents a vast opportunity for those prepared to venture into new territories of drug discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00237

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In drug development, 500 Da is often quoted as the maximum molecular weight parameter, but molecules with higher molecular weights can be absorbed, and the limits of oral bioavailability appear to extend to about MW ≤ 1000 Da.

    “In the development of new drugs, 500 Da is often quoted as the maximum molecular weight parameter. However, it has been observed that molecules with higher molecular weights are also capable of being absorbed, and the limits of oral bioavailability appear to extend to about MW ≤ 1000 Da [70,71,72].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsson, P., & Kihlberg, J.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Kihlberg, Jan
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2017-02-24
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
1662-1664
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W2590560529
Cited by
303
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
membrane permeability, molecular weight, cyclic peptides, protein-protein interaction, drug-like molecules, chemical space
MeSH terms
Cell Membrane Permeability, Humans, Molecular Weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review