Cited by 253Protein Degradation and InhibitorsCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure-Based Discovery of SD-36 as a Potent, Selective, and Efficacious PROTAC Degrader of STAT3 Protein

Open access

Abstract

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is a transcription factor and an attractive therapeutic target for cancer and other human diseases. Despite 20 years of persistent research efforts, targeting STAT3 has been very challenging. We report herein the structure-based discovery of potent small-molecule STAT3 degraders based upon the proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) concept. We first designed SI-109 as a potent, small-molecule inhibitor of the STAT3 SH2 domain. Employing ligands for cereblon/cullin 4A E3 ligase and SI-109, we obtained a series of potent PROTAC STAT3 degraders, exemplified by SD-36. SD-36 induces rapid STAT3 degradation at low nanomolar concentrations in cells and fails to degrade other STAT proteins. SD-36 achieves nanomolar cell growth inhibitory activity in leukemia and lymphoma cell lines with high levels of phosphorylated STAT3. A single dose of SD-36 results in complete STAT3 protein degradation in xenograft tumor tissue and normal mouse tissues. SD-36 achieves complete and long-lasting tumor regression in the Molm-16 xenograft tumor model at well-tolerated dose-schedules. SD-36 is a potent, selective, and efficacious STAT3 degrader.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01530

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bricogne, G.; Blanc, E.; Brandl, M.; Flensburg, C.; Keller, P.; Paciorek, W.; Roversi, P.; Sharff, A.; Smart, O. S.; Vonrhein, C.; Womack, T. O. BUSTER, version, 2.10.3; Global Phasing Ltd.: Cambridge, U.K., 2017.
  2. Smart, O. S.; Womack, T. O.; Sharff, A.; Flensburg, C.; Keller, P.; Paciorek, W.; Vonrhein, C.; Bricogne, G. GRADE, version 1.2.13; Global Phasing Ltd.: Cambridge, U.K., 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 253

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, H., Bai, L., Xu, R., Zhao, Y., Chen, J., McEachern, D., Chinnaswamy, K., Wen, B., Dai, L., Kumar, P., Yang, C.-Y., Liu, Z., Wang, M., Liu, L., Meagher, J. L., Yi, H., Sun, D., Stuckey, J. A., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Shaomeng
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
62
Issue
24
Pages
11280-11300
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W2990256176
Cited by
233
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA046592)
  • Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan
  • Oncopia Therapeutics Inc.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
STAT3, PROTACs, small-molecule degraders, SH2 domain inhibitors, structure-based drug design, leukemia, lymphoma, xenograft tumor regression, protein degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Azocines, Female, Humans, Indoles, Protein Conformation, Tissue Distribution, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Drug Design, Molecular Structure, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Mice, SCID, Apoptosis, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Proliferation, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice, Drug Discovery, Proteolysis, Organophosphonates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review