The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An In Situ Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy Study of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction: Selectivity Dependence on Surface C-Bound and O-Bound Reaction Intermediates
Open accessAbstract
The CO 2 electroreduction reaction (CO2RR) is a promising avenue to convert greenhouse gases into high-value fuels and chemicals, in addition to being an attractive method for storing intermittent renewable energy. Although polycrystalline Cu surfaces have long been known to be unique in their capabilities of catalyzing the conversion of CO 2 to higher-order C1 and C2 fuels, such as hydrocarbons (CH 4, C 2 H 4, etc.) and alcohols (CH 3 OH, C 2 H 5 OH), product selectivity remains a challenge. Rational design of more selective catalysts would greatly benefit from a mechanistic understanding of the complex, multiproton, and multielectron conversion of CO 2 . In this study, we select three metal catalysts (Pt, Au, Cu) and apply in situ surface enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS) and ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS), coupled to density-functional theory (DFT) calculations, to get insight into the reaction pathway for the CO2RR. We present a comprehensive reaction mechanism for the CO2RR and show that the preferential reaction pathway can be rationalized in terms of metal–carbon (M–C) and metal–oxygen (M–O) affinity. We show that the final products are determined by the configuration of the initial intermediates, C-bound and O-bound, which can be obtained from CO 2 and (H)CO 3, respectively. C1 hydrocarbons are produced via OCH 3,ad intermediates obtained from O-bound CO 3,ad and require a catalyst with relatively high affinity for O-bound intermediates. Additionally, C2 hydrocarbon formation is suggested to result from the C–C coupling between C-bound CO ad and (H)CO ad, which requires an optimal affinity for the C-bound species, so that (H)CO ad can be further reduced without poisoning the catalyst surface. It is suggested that the formation of C1 alcohols (CH 3 OH) is the most challenging process to optimize, as stabilization of the O-bound species would both accelerate the formation of key intermediates (OCH 3,ad ) but also simultaneously inhibit their desorption from the catalyst surface. Our findings pave the way toward a design strategy for CO2RR catalysts with improved selectivity, based on the experimental/theoretical reaction mechanisms that have been identified. These results also suggest that designing the electronic structure of the catalyst is not the sole determining factor to achieve highly selective CO2RR catalysis; rather, tuning additional experimental reaction conditions such as electrolyte–intermediate interactions also become critical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design
Seh, Z. W., Kibsgaard, J., Dickens, C. F., Chorkendorff, I., Nørskov, J. K., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4998 · Cited by 12,114
Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Q uantum ESPRESSO
Giannozzi, P., Andreussi, O., Brumme, T., Bunau, O., Buongiorno Nardelli, M., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Cococcioni, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8f79 · Cited by 8,361
Self-citationHow copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
Hori, Y., Wakebe, H., Tsukamoto, T., & Koga, O. (1994) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(94)85172-7 · Cited by 2,140
Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu
Dal Corso, A. (2014) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.043 · Cited by 2,016
Enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction via field-induced reagent concentration
Liu, M., Pang, Y., Zhang, B., De Luna, P., Voznyy, O., Xu, J., Zheng, X., Dinh, C. T., Fan, F., Cao, C., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19060 · Cited by 2,000
Activity Descriptors for CO 2 Electroreduction to Methane on Transition-Metal Catalysts
Peterson, A. A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz201461p · Cited by 1,667
Electrocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methane and Methanol on Transition Metal Surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Hatsukade, T., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., Kibsgaard, J., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja505791r · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Boosting electrocatalytic CO2–to–ethanol production via asymmetric C–C coupling
Wang, P., Yang, H., Tang, C., Wu, Y., Zheng, Y., Cheng, T., Davey, K., Huang, X., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31427-9 · Cited by 574
Stable and Efficient Single-Atom Zn Catalyst for CO2 Reduction to CH4
Han, L., Song, S., Liu, M., Yao, S., Liang, Z., Cheng, H., Ren, Z., Liu, W., Lin, R., Qi, G., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b12111 · Cited by 538
Shih, A. J., Monteiro, M. C. O., Dattila, F., Pavesi, D., Philips, M., da Silva, A. H. M., Vos, R. E., Ojha, K., Park, S., van der Heijden, O., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00164-0 · Cited by 521
Stabilizing Cu2+ Ions by Solid Solutions to Promote CO2 Electroreduction to Methane
Zhou, X., Shan, J., Chen, L., Xia, B. Y., Ling, T., Duan, J., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c12212 · Cited by 518
CO2 Electrochemical Reduction As Probed through Infrared Spectroscopy
Zhu, S., Li, T., Cai, W.-B., & Shao, M. (2019) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02525 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Katayama, Y., Nattino, F., Giordano, L., Hwang, J., Rao, R. R., Andreussi, O., Marzari, N., & Shao-Horn, Y.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-12-19
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5951-5963
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2904955702
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An In Situ Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy Study of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction: Selectivity Dependence on Surface C-Bound and O-Bound Reaction Intermediates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09598
- The paper
- Katayama, Y., Nattino, F., Giordano, L., Hwang, J., Rao, R. R., Andreussi, O., Marzari, N., & Shao-Horn, Y. (2019). An In Situ Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy Study of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction: Selectivity Dependence on Surface C-Bound and O-Bound Reaction Intermediates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.